Hi Armin, thanks for your patience, first! but the things with declaring PK_Fields i read at: http://db.apache.org/ojb/howto-use-anonymous-keys.html i did everything like told me :-) the document is written nice and understandful, but only the little thing froeign-key is null in my case...
did you know if this sample is available? i didnīt found it in src-distribution. thanks alot! --- Armin Waibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Hi Ralf, > > > but in my case the own idīs > > of a class where anonymous too, > > is that the matter? > > AFAIK we don't have a test case that mix this stuff. > Think it is not allowed to declare a PK field > anonymous. > Recommend you to setup a test case similar to the > examples in test suite > or docu > (http://db.apache.org/ojb/tutorial3.html#Mapping 1:1 > > associations). As recently as your test pass start > to tweak ;-) > > regards, > Armin > > > Ralf Bode wrote: > > Hi Armin, again... > > ...sorry... > > > > i looked in samples you told me! > > (thanks for tipps!) > > but i have all so like > > 1:1-relationship > > org.apache.ojb.broker.ObjectRepository$Group > > org.apache.ojb.broker.ObjectRepository$Componente > > (access="anonymous" for reffered ids) > > but in my case the own idīs > > of a class where anonymous too, > > is that the matter? > > but i donīt think so, because > > for car and customer a id is "generated". > > > > But only!!! the reffered id > > (in customer for car is "null") > > > > ...strangely... isnīt it ? > > > > perhaps i can send it to list / to you? > > (i asked, because i will not blow up list > > with my (i think) foolishness) > > > > thanks for your patience! > > ralf > > --- Armin Waibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > > Hi > > Ralf, > > > >>Ralf Bode wrote: > >> > >>>hi ... again :-( > >>> > >>>it is really frustratingly... > >>>i turned OTM->true > >>>made: > >>>customer.setCar(car) > >>>broker.store(customer); > >>> > >> > >>I don't know what's wrong with your test, but this > >>will definitely work > >>with the PB-api. > >>You can find many examples in test suite, e.g. > >>...broker.AnonymousFieldsTest. > >> > >>regards, > >>Armin > >> > >> > >>>but same... > >>>customer is in DB, car not! > >>>:-( > >>> > >>>i have read in aritcle in german-javamag > >>>on OJB there was said "all is nice" > >>> > >>>or am i to stuid? > >>> > >>>i though it would be possible > >>>to store "customer" and his car... > >>>has anyone a "runnig"-case for an idot, like me? > >>> > >>>thanks! > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> --- Brian McCallister > >>><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > > >> > >>Objects > >> > >>>are not automatically stored by reachability > >>> > >>> > >>>>-- the car isn't > >>>>inserted because it is attached to Customer. > This > >>>>*can* actually be > >>>>done in the OTM if Car is a truly dependent > object > >>>>(otm-dependent > >>>>attribute), but in the PB an object must be made > >>>>explicitly persistent. > >>>> > >>>>broker.store(ca); > >>>>broker.store(cu); > >>>> > >>>>-Brian > >>>> > >>>>On Feb 2, 2004, at 3:13 PM, Ralf Bode wrote: > >>>> > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>Hi Brian, > >>>>>now i got an "anonym" id > >>>>>(very nice, so i now have "pure" javaBeans > >>>>>no technicals in it :-) > >>>>> > >>>>>i made > >>>>>cu = new Custiomer(); > >>>>>ca = new Car(); > >>>>>cu.setCar(ca); > >>>>>broker.store(cu); > >>>>> > >>>>>now only a customer was in DB > >>>>> > >>>>>i must add the "auto-*" in descriptor: > >>>>><reference-descriptor > >>>>> name="car" > >>>>> class-ref="de.ralle.Car" > >>>>> auto-retrive="true" > >>>>> auto-update="true" > >>>>> auto-delete="true"> > >>>>><foreignkey field-ref="carId"/> > >>>>></reference-descriptor> > >>>>> > >>>>>now i have a car and a customer, > >>>>>but custumer.carId is "null" in database... > >>>>>of course carId is anonym too! ... > >>>>> > >>>>>any idea? or am i to silly > >>>>>and i must do pure sql ... as a penalty... ? > :-) > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>in table customer is: > >>>>>CREATE TABLE CUSTOMER > >>>>>( > >>>>> ID INT PRIMARY KEY AUTO_INCREMENT, > >>>>> CARID INT, > >>>>> FOREIGN KEY (CARID) REFERENCES CAR(ID) > >>>>>); > >>>>> > >>>>>thanks! > >>>>> > >>>>>--- Ralf Bode <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > > >>>> > >>>>Thanks > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>Brian, > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>>>but do you mean with "anonymous" keys ? > >>>>>> > >>>>>>now i have (in classes): > >>>>>>CUSTOMER > >>>>>>car: Car > >>>>>>carId: int > >>>>>> > >>>>>>CAR: > >>>>>>id: int > >>>>>> > >>>>>>(and the XML desc for it like in mail before) > >>>>>>am i with anon.keys able to "see" car-fk in > >>>>>>database-table CUSTOMER? > >>>>>>after: > >>>>>>broker.store(customer); ? > >>>>>> > >>>>>>thanks again, and thanks for your patience. > >>>>>>greetings! > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>> > >>>>>>>On the FK thing, if you do not use anonymous > >>>> > >>>>FK's > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>>>>the ID's need to be > >>>>>>>managed manually, as well as the references. > I > >>>>>> > === message truncated === __________________________________________________________________ Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - http://mail.yahoo.de Mit Yahoo! Suche finden Sie alles: http://suche.yahoo.de --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
