Hi Armin, Brain and the rest :-)

hier is my code (a simple test-example)
CAR:
package de.ralle;

import java.io.Serializable;

//the CAR
public class Auto implements Serializable{

        private String farbe;
        public Auto() {
        }

        public String getFarbe() {
                return farbe;
        }

        public void setFarbe(String string) {
                farbe = string;
        }

}

CUSTOMER:
package de.ralle;

import java.io.Serializable;

//my customer!
public class Kunde implements Serializable{
        

        private String vorname;
        private String nachname;

        private Auto auto;


        public Kunde(){ 
        }

        public Auto getAuto() {
                return auto;
        }

        public String getNachname() {
                return nachname;
        }

        public String getVorname() {
                return vorname;
        }

        public void setAuto(Auto auto) {
                this.auto = auto;
        }

        public void setNachname(String string) {
                nachname = string;
        }

        public void setVorname(String string) {
                vorname = string;
        }

}

and XML:
<class-descriptor 
        class="de.ralle.Kunde" 
        table="Kunde" >

        <field-descriptor
                id="1"
                name="id"
                column="id"
                jdbc-type="INTEGER"
                primarykey="true"
                access="anonymous"/>
        <field-descriptor
                id="2"
                name="vorname"
                column="vorname"
                jdbc-type="VARCHAR"/>
        <field-descriptor
                id="3"
                name="nachname"
                column="nachname"
                jdbc-type="VARCHAR"/>
        <field-descriptor
                id="4" 
                name="autoId" 
                column="autoid" 
                jdbc-type="INTEGER"
                access="anonymous"/>

        <reference-descriptor 
                name="auto" 
                class-ref="de.ralle.Auto"
                auto-retrieve="true"
                auto-update="true"
                auto-delete="true">
                <foreignkey field-ref="autoId"/>
        </reference-descriptor>
</class-descriptor>
<class-descriptor 
        class="de.ralle.Auto" 
        table="auto">
        <field-descriptor 
                id="1" 
                name="id" 
                column="id" 
                jdbc-type="INTEGER" 
                primarykey="true"
                access="anonymous"/>
        <field-descriptor 
                id="2" 
                name="farbe" 
                column="farbe" 
                jdbc-type="VARCHAR" />
</class-descriptor>



THANKS!

 --- Armin Waibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: > Hi
Ralf,
> 
> it does deal with anonymous fields, but only in
> conjunction with 1:1 
> references. Please post class-descriptor and source
> for Customer, Car.
> 
> regards,
> Armin
> 
> Ralf Bode wrote:
> 
> > Hi Armin.
> > 
> > okay i didnīt know about 1.0rc5 isnīt
> > dealing with anonymous-keys.
> > 
> > so i do like suggested in 1:1-mapping.
> > 
> > but then in my Beans i have
> > int carId
> > Car car;
> > 
> > i do now:
> > setCar(Car c){
> > car = c;
> > carId = c.getId();
> > }
> > 
> > but i think this is redundant, isnīt ?
> > now i am very confused on dealing with OJB...
> > 
> > a short, and last question,
> > why doesnīt OJB1.0.rc5 not deal with
> anonymous-keys
> > i thought its a nice feature!
> > 
> > greetings ralf
> > 
> > 
> >  --- Armin Waibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: >
> Hi,
> > 
> >>Ralf Bode wrote:
> >>
> >>>Hi Armin,
> >>>thanks for your patience, first!
> >>>but the things with declaring PK_Fields
> >>>i read at:
> >>>
> >>
> >
>
http://db.apache.org/ojb/howto-use-anonymous-keys.html
> > 
> >>>i did everything like told me :-)
> >>>the document is written nice and understandful,
> >>
> >>doh! Assume the current implementation doesn't
> >>achieve this. All 
> >>anonymous keys are held in an internal map using
> the
> >>object itself as 
> >>key. Reading will be successful, but when the
> object
> >>e.g. will be 
> >>serialized and then returned to OJB the anonymous
> PK
> >>field will never be 
> >>found (object does not match a key), its only
> >>possible to extract the FK 
> >>from the associated reference object.
> >>Thus I think anonymous keys will only work in
> >>conjunction with 1:1 
> >>references.
> >>I don't write the 'anonymous-key' stuff, so maybe
> I
> >>overlooked an 
> >>important argument.
> >>
> >>regards,
> >>Armin
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>but only the little thing 
> >>>froeign-key is null in my case...
> >>>
> >>>did you know if this sample is available?
> >>>i didnīt found it in src-distribution.
> >>>
> >>>thanks alot!
> >>>
> >>> --- Armin Waibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: >
> >>
> >>Hi
> >>
> >>>Ralf,
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>>but in my case the own idīs
> >>>>>of a class where anonymous too,
> >>>>>is that the matter?
> >>>>
> >>>>AFAIK we don't have a test case that mix this
> >>
> >>stuff.
> >>
> >>>>Think it is not allowed to declare a PK field
> >>>>anonymous.
> >>>>Recommend you to setup a test case similar to
> the
> >>>>examples in test suite 
> >>>>or docu
> >>>>(http://db.apache.org/ojb/tutorial3.html#Mapping
> >>
> >>1:1
> >>
> >>>>associations). As recently as your test pass
> start
> >>>>to tweak ;-)
> >>>>
> >>>>regards,
> >>>>Armin
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>Ralf Bode wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>Hi Armin, again...
> >>>>>...sorry...
> >>>>>
> >>>>>i looked in samples you told me!
> >>>>>(thanks for tipps!)
> >>>>>but i have all so like
> >>>>>1:1-relationship
> >>>>>org.apache.ojb.broker.ObjectRepository$Group
>
>>>>>org.apache.ojb.broker.ObjectRepository$Componente
> >>>>>(access="anonymous" for reffered ids)
> >>>>>but in my case the own idīs
> >>>>>of a class where anonymous too,
> >>>>>is that the matter?
> >>>>>but i donīt think so, because
> >>>>>for car and customer a id is "generated".
> >>>>>
> >>>>>But only!!! the reffered id 
> >>>>>(in customer for car is "null")
> >>>>>
> >>>>>...strangely... isnīt it ?
> >>>>>
> >>>>>perhaps i can send it to list / to you?
> >>>>>(i asked, because i will not blow up list
> >>>>> with my (i think) foolishness)
> >>>>>
> >>>>>thanks for your patience!
> >>>>>ralf
> >>>>>--- Armin Waibel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> schrieb: >
> >>>>
> >>>>Hi
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>Ralf,
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>Ralf Bode wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>hi ... again :-(
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>it is really frustratingly...
> >>>>>>>i turned OTM->true
> >>>>>>>made:
> >>>>>>>customer.setCar(car)
> >>>>>>>broker.store(customer);
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>I don't know what's wrong with your test, but
> >>
> >>this
> >>
> >>>>>>will definitely work 
> >>>>>>with the PB-api.
> >>>>>>You can find many examples in test suite, e.g.
> 
> >>>>>>...broker.AnonymousFieldsTest.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>regards,
> >>>>>>Armin
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>but same...
> >>>>>>>customer is in DB, car not!
> >>>>>>>:-(
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>i have read in aritcle in german-javamag
> >>>>>>>on OJB there was said "all is nice"
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>or am i to stuid?
> 
=== message truncated === 

__________________________________________________________________

Gesendet von Yahoo! Mail - http://mail.yahoo.de
Mit Yahoo! Suche finden Sie alles: http://suche.yahoo.de

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]

Reply via email to