Hi Marco, On 6/20/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am developing a project using OJB with the xdoclet module as persistance layer. In my project I need to use interfaces, but I have a problem in the xdoclet annotation of the interfaces. For example, if I write: /** * Interface describing a resource * * @ojb.class * * * @ojb.field name="description" * jdbc-type="VARCHAR" * length="300" * */ public interface Resource...... The field "description" is marked as anonymous and inherited as anonymous by all subclasses. Reading the OJB guide (section "Using interfaces with OJB") the interface fields are not anonymous. Where am I wrong?
If you put the ojb.field tag into the interface Javadoc, then they'll be anonymous. If you want non-anonymous ones, then you need to create declarations for the getters/setters for these fields in the interface and tag them with ojb.field accordingly, if you want OJB to be able to use them via the interface. Tom --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
