please don't let this become the struts list. It's funny sometimes, but mostly just 
noise.

This doesn't reflect on the struts application, I like it. I like the people on the 
struts list, it's just getting out of hand.

-----Original Message-----
From: James Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 12:03 PM
To: OJB Users List
Subject: RE: [not going to work] Posts in this list...


-1

We are trying to do the same thing on struts-user motivated by certain
peoples objection of [Off Topic] type posts....like questions about beer, vi
and Emacs, more beer, who's older ....ooops, I mean tales of our first
PC/Mac/Whatever....you know, things like that ;)



James Mitchell
Software Engineer\Struts Evangelist
Struts-Atlanta, the "Open Minded Developer Network"
http://www.open-tools.org/struts-atlanta




> -----Original Message-----
> From: Dave Derry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 2:55 PM
> To: OJB Users List
> Subject: Re: Posts in this list...
>
>
> -1
> The category heading is a workable suggestion if employed as a guidline. I
> don't feel that it should be mandatory. That might put people off on using
> OJB, if they feel that they can't easily request assistance.
>
> Although it is a good way to filter the messages, it is *NOT* a widely
> recognized convention. New people cannot be expected to know that it is a
> requirement for posting.
>
> $0.02 more,
> Dave Derry
>
>
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "Richard Mottershead" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>
> > Alternativly, keep the list the same, but require users to add some form
> of
> > mandatory catagory keyword to the email Subject text. Failure to add a
> > category would result in the mail being bounced back to the user with a
> > pleasant message of the form:
> >
> > "Which catagory does your request fall into X,Y,Z etc". Please add the
> > appropriate keyword to the subject text for your question to be
> accepted"
> >
> > Users could then run email rules to sift mails into relevant sub folders
> for
> > analysis.
> >
> > BTW evryone who answers questions on this list is doing a great job. I
> hope
> > to be able to this myself soon as well.
> >
> > Yours,
> > Richard.
> >
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Richard Mottershead [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> >
> >
> > Due to the popularity of OJB (horay!!)The number of daily posts in this
> list
> > is reaching a level where your normal user (i.e. me) can't take
> it all in.
> > Could the list be spliton a topic basis? For example:
> >
> > [1] Installation (and getting the beast working)
> > [2] Examples (and problems with).
> > [3] Database/Schema Mapping/Configuration file issues.
> > [4] Sequence Manager
> > [5] Persistance Broker
> > [6] Envionment & Deployment (with without Proxy, Tomcat etc)
> > [7] General
> >
> > I know this would probably be abused and everybody could dump in the
> General
> > list but these could be redirected by users in the know to the correct
> > catagory...
> >
> > Yours,
> > Richard
>
>
>
> --
> To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>


--
To unsubscribe, e-mail:   <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Reply via email to