My assumption is that if a question isn't answered, probably no one knows the definitive answer.
I'd say considering the size of the communities, OJB does a pretty good job responding to most inquiries. Jacob re-posted 2 hours ago, a bit early to say it's been ignored/missed again wouldn't you say? m -----Original Message----- From: James Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 2:30 PM To: OJB Users List Subject: RE: [not going to work] Posts in this list... Yes, it can get [FRIVOLOUS] sometimes ;) but we all know each other pretty well and we aren't afraid to answer any question, no matter how easy or difficult. (Unlike a few questions I've seen on this list) Jacob Hookom asked a question about stored procedures earlier that was ignored/missed, and I mentioned to him to repost it....and (unless I've missed a response somewhere) it looks like it's been ignored/missed again. I would answer it for him, but I'm still new to OJB myself. Sorry Jacob. James Mitchell Software Engineer\Struts Evangelist Struts-Atlanta, the "Open Minded Developer Network" http://www.open-tools.org/struts-atlanta > -----Original Message----- > From: Matthew Baird [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 5:09 PM > To: OJB Users List > Subject: RE: [not going to work] Posts in this list... > > > Obviously I don't mean the whole list is just noise, just the [OT] stuff. > > -----Original Message----- > From: Matthew Baird > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 2:05 PM > To: OJB Users List > Subject: RE: [not going to work] Posts in this list... > > > please don't let this become the struts list. It's funny > sometimes, but mostly just noise. > > This doesn't reflect on the struts application, I like it. I like > the people on the struts list, it's just getting out of hand. > > -----Original Message----- > From: James Mitchell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 12:03 PM > To: OJB Users List > Subject: RE: [not going to work] Posts in this list... > > > -1 > > We are trying to do the same thing on struts-user motivated by certain > peoples objection of [Off Topic] type posts....like questions > about beer, vi > and Emacs, more beer, who's older ....ooops, I mean tales of our first > PC/Mac/Whatever....you know, things like that ;) > > > > James Mitchell > Software Engineer\Struts Evangelist > Struts-Atlanta, the "Open Minded Developer Network" > http://www.open-tools.org/struts-atlanta > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Dave Derry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > Sent: Wednesday, September 11, 2002 2:55 PM > > To: OJB Users List > > Subject: Re: Posts in this list... > > > > > > -1 > > The category heading is a workable suggestion if employed as a > guidline. I > > don't feel that it should be mandatory. That might put people > off on using > > OJB, if they feel that they can't easily request assistance. > > > > Although it is a good way to filter the messages, it is *NOT* a widely > > recognized convention. New people cannot be expected to know > that it is a > > requirement for posting. > > > > $0.02 more, > > Dave Derry > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- > > From: "Richard Mottershead" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > Alternativly, keep the list the same, but require users to > add some form > > of > > > mandatory catagory keyword to the email Subject text. Failure to add a > > > category would result in the mail being bounced back to the > user with a > > > pleasant message of the form: > > > > > > "Which catagory does your request fall into X,Y,Z etc". Please add the > > > appropriate keyword to the subject text for your question to be > > accepted" > > > > > > Users could then run email rules to sift mails into relevant > sub folders > > for > > > analysis. > > > > > > BTW evryone who answers questions on this list is doing a great job. I > > hope > > > to be able to this myself soon as well. > > > > > > Yours, > > > Richard. > > > > > > -----Original Message----- > > > From: Richard Mottershead [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]] > > > > > > > > > Due to the popularity of OJB (horay!!)The number of daily > posts in this > > list > > > is reaching a level where your normal user (i.e. me) can't take > > it all in. > > > Could the list be spliton a topic basis? For example: > > > > > > [1] Installation (and getting the beast working) > > > [2] Examples (and problems with). > > > [3] Database/Schema Mapping/Configuration file issues. > > > [4] Sequence Manager > > > [5] Persistance Broker > > > [6] Envionment & Deployment (with without Proxy, Tomcat etc) > > > [7] General > > > > > > I know this would probably be abused and everybody could dump in the > > General > > > list but these could be redirected by users in the know to the correct > > > catagory... > > > > > > Yours, > > > Richard > > > > > > > > -- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -- To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
