I had suggested replacing the current db-centric security service that is based Torque with an OJB version. The reaction was positive, however, it probably won't make it into the next release. I haven't had any spare time to work on it so it could be sometime before it is available.
The Turbine vs. Struts issue has been floating around on jetspeed-user for a couple of weeks now. AFAIK, Jetspeed isn't dropping Turbine anytime soon. Most of the committers, of which I am not, are very content with using Turbine for the time being. Scott > -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Mahler [mailto:thma@;apache.org] > Sent: Monday, November 04, 2002 3:10 PM > To: OJB Users List > Subject: Re: OJB/Struts and Jetspeed > > Hi, > > Hoang, Hai wrote: > > Hi, > > > > I am a Struts and OJB user and I would like to use Jetspeed. The > problem is > > that Jetspeed architecture is heavily depended on > turbine/velocity/torque > > frameworks. What I want to know is there any plans, initiatives or fork > to > > decouple Jetspeed to allow it to work with OJB/Struts frameworks? > > AFAIK there are currently no such plans among OJB developers. > I don't know if there such plans in the Jetspeed community. > > cheers, > Thomas > > > > > Are there any supports from Struts and OJB user communities to port > > Jetspeed? > > > > Thank you, > > Hai Hoang > > > > > > > _________________________________________________________________________ > > Introducing the all new and improved continental.com. With a totally > new > > personalized design, it's the best place to go. Before you go. > > > > Continental Airlines. Work Hard. Fly Right. > > > > http://www.continental.com > > > > > > > > -- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: <mailto:ojb-user-unsubscribe@;jakarta.apache.org> > For additional commands, e-mail: <mailto:ojb-user-help@;jakarta.apache.org>
