On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Jordan's Lists <[email protected]> wrote: > Looks good to me -- I added a link to the open definition as you suggested > Claudia.
Great! > That made me think that perhaps there should be a short note under > "Submission Details" that open as defined in the open definition is one of > the factors of the review process? Good call. Added: "We welcome proposals on any aspect of creating, publishing or reusing content or data that is open in accordance with opendefinition.org. Topics include but are not limited to: [...]" Too verbose? Is scope wide enough? -- Jonathan Gray Community Coordinator The Open Knowledge Foundation http://www.okfn.org _______________________________________________ okfn-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.okfn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss
