Hi Jonathan,
On Nov 3, 2009, at 9:11 AM, Jonathan Gray wrote:
On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 12:07 PM, Jordan's Lists
<[email protected]> wrote:
Looks good to me -- I added a link to the open definition as you
suggested
Claudia.
Great!
That made me think that perhaps there should be a short note under
"Submission Details" that open as defined in the open definition is
one of
the factors of the review process?
Good call. Added:
"We welcome proposals on any aspect of creating, publishing or reusing
content or data that is open in accordance with opendefinition.org.
Topics include but are not limited to: [...]"
Too verbose? Is scope wide enough?
For me it sounds good.
:-)
Have a nice day.
--clmb
--
Jonathan Gray
Community Coordinator
The Open Knowledge Foundation
http://www.okfn.org
_______________________________________________
okfn-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.okfn.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss
