dear all,

On 29/01/2010 16:18, Mr. Puneet Kishor wrote:
There is so much open and often linked data available on the web, but
there has been a lack of an integration service tying together all that linked
data into a more coherent experience.

This is great, but how is it different from http://ckan.net?

Having a service like this is extremely necessary, but having too many
services like this, especially ones that overlap, might lead to
confusion. Clarity of purpose vis a vis existing efforts might be very
helpful.

Well, that's how the semweb, or Web of Data, or Linked Data Web, is likely to look in the short term. Lots and lots of aggregation services collecting different subsets of the universe of triples. Re-aggregating other sites, moving eyeballs around.

You can see a reflection of this in social network cross-posting and aggregation services, for example FriendFeed. This was bought by Facebook, I imagine because it was potentially or actually diverting traffic away from FB.

An online service like FriendFeed collects your communication streams from different sites together. A client like Posterous or even Tweetdeck lets you send messages through to multiple sites. It matters less and less where the information is made, where it is stored, as long as it can be discovered.

Yes this leads to a lot of redundancy. We have got used to the centralised, one-ring-to-rule model for types of online services, redundancy can be confusing - one never knows exactly where to look, and everything is slightly deja vu.

Years ago I worked on a prototype online service for a kind of self-organising, distributed art festival in London. It pulled in RSS listings from different event sites, correlated that with spatial RDF from the OpenGuides wiki, FOAF maps of participants...

The event curators loved the *idea*. When they were presented with the actual prototype, the main response "there are seven versions of this event here. Which is the real one?"

Puneet, I think we just have to get used to overlap.


jo
--


_______________________________________________
okfn-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss

Reply via email to