While I managed to rant a bit below, I neglected to address the main
point squarely --
On Jan 29, 2010, at 11:51 AM, Mr. Puneet Kishor wrote:
On Jan 29, 2010, at 11:07 AM, Jo Walsh wrote:
..
Puneet, I think we just have to get used to overlap.
indeed, multiple overlapping services may be inevitable, and perhaps
even welcome from an "ecology" perspective. However, since CKAN is an
OKFN production, it might be worthwhile to aim for CKAN to become like
CPAN, say, 5-10 years from now. *The* canonical repository for
knowledge. After all, no point in having the adjective "Comprehensive"
in its name, if we don't mean it, and intend to make it so.
--
Puneet Kishor http://www.punkish.org
Carbon Model http://carbonmodel.org
Charter Member, Open Source Geospatial Foundation http://www.osgeo.org
Science Commons Fellow, http://sciencecommons.org/about/whoweare/kishor
Nelson Institute, UW-Madison http://www.nelson.wisc.edu
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Assertions are politics; backing up assertions with evidence is science
=======================================================================
_______________________________________________
okfn-discuss mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss
