On 16 September 2010 20:50, Keith Alexander <[email protected]> wrote: > Hi > > So if I can reprise: > > * Whether a dataset links to a waiver, a license, a public domain > dedication, or a copyright statement, the relationship between the > dataset and the legal document is the same: "here is a document > describing what you are allowed to do with this dataset". > * When describing datasets with RDF, it is simpler if everyone uses > the same property for this relationship ("here is a document > describing what you are allowed to do with this dataset"). > * Is there any good reason why dcterms:license should not be used to > relate a dataset and a document describing what you are legally > allowed to do with the dataset (whether that document is technically a > Waiver, a License, a Contract, a Dedication, whatever) ?
No, I think using dcterms:license would be fine. > (if so, presumably dcterms:rights would be OK?) I think you can just use dcterms:license and that would be best. Rufus -- Open Knowledge Foundation Promoting Open Knowledge in a Digital Age http://www.okfn.org/ - http://blog.okfn.org/ _______________________________________________ okfn-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss
