Just add to this, as IAALBIANYL [1] On 15 Sep 2010, at 15:30, Mr. Puneet Kishor wrote:
> IANAL, but from what I understand, a license is not a contract, and a license > is not a waiver [1-4]. > > Creative Commons specifically terms CC0 as a waiver of license, while its > traditional CC licenses are, well, licenses. > > It is common but inaccurate assumption to think of licenses the same as > contracts. > > Copyright is a license, and is governed by federal laws in the US. A contract > requires at least two parties to agree to certain terms and conditions, and > is governed by state laws in the US. > > According to my law dictionary, a license is a unilateral permission granted > by a property owner to do certain things with the licensed property. > > A waiver is the absence of a license. > > I wish this confusion were resolved, and the popular usage and the bookish > definitions would come into conformance. The license/contract thing is irrelevant here. If you'd like to learn more about the issue, I can recommend several article by Andres Guadamuz looking at license/contracts, including: Guadamuz, Andrés, The License/Contract Dichotomy in Open Licenses: A Comparative Analysis (April 2, 2009). University of La Verne Law Review, Vol. 30, No. 2, pp. 101-116, 2009. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1372040 For the license versus waiver issue, the structure of BOTH the PDDL and CC0 is to also include a license alongside the public domain dedication. The PDDL is just much more up front about the fact that this is inside the legal terms (as its in the name). The license component in both cases is as broad a license as you can imagine and effectively like the public domain. The reason why a license is included alongside the public domain dedication is that it is not effectively clear in every jurisdiction that a public domain dedication will work. It turns out giving up your rights in copyright is harder than you might think. Including a license is a belt and braces approach to making sure that people who would like to place their work in the public domain can effectively do so. How you describe this technically, I'd say could go either as a waiver or a license, or even both (as it is both). Thanks! ~Jordan [1] http://www.jordanhatcher.com/legal/iaalbianyl/ _______________________________________________ okfn-discuss mailing list [email protected] http://lists.okfn.org/mailman/listinfo/okfn-discuss
