https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177213
--- Comment #31 from Oscar Fuentes <ofv wanadoo es> 2010-03-17 20:23:04 --- (In reply to comment #30) > (In reply to comment #29) > > As mentioned on the past too, I did some informal benchmarks and perceived > > no > > speed difference on page rendering after changing Okular's memory usage > > setting, nor I perceive differences with other pdf viewers (xpdf, for > > instance). > > Your personal benchmarks are not our personal benchmarks nor other people's > benchmarks. Thanks for making this a constructive discussion. :-/ > > This is a critical issue when the X server is a machine > > wiht 1 GB of RAM and the X client has 8 GB: after browsing a few hundred > > pages > > the X server starts paginating and finally crashes due to lack of memory. > > This is another issue, unrelated to this one. Please keep it separate. Well, if you don't see the relation, I give up. It is obvious that you are too proud of the "genial" idea of using the X server as a cache for Okular and are not willing to admit that it has some serious drawbacks. As far as I'm concerned, do with this bug report whatever you please. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Okular-devel mailing list Okular-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel