https://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=177213
--- Comment #32 from Pino Toscano <pino kde org> 2010-03-17 20:53:27 --- (In reply to comment #31) > (In reply to comment #30) > > (In reply to comment #29) > > > As mentioned on the past too, I did some informal benchmarks and > > > perceived no > > > speed difference on page rendering after changing Okular's memory usage > > > setting, nor I perceive differences with other pdf viewers (xpdf, for > > > instance). > > > > Your personal benchmarks are not our personal benchmarks nor other people's > > benchmarks. > > Thanks for making this a constructive discussion. :-/ Right, because claiming "I did some generic benchmarks so change the behaviour" is constructive? > > > This is a critical issue when the X server is a machine > > > wiht 1 GB of RAM and the X client has 8 GB: after browsing a few hundred > > > pages > > > the X server starts paginating and finally crashes due to lack of memory. > > > > This is another issue, unrelated to this one. Please keep it separate. > > Well, if you don't see the relation, I give up. Right, I don't see the relation. The issue you mentioned could be fixed even still with Okular using X. > It is obvious that you are too > proud of the "genial" idea of using the X server as a cache for Okular and are > not willing to admit that it has some serious drawbacks. Don't be ridicolous and put words in our mouths or ideas in our minds which are *not* ours. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugs.kde.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the assignee for the bug. _______________________________________________ Okular-devel mailing list Okular-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel