El Dilluns, 22 d'abril de 2013, a les 09:27:21, Jaydeep Solanki va escriure: > On Mon, Apr 22, 2013 at 2:54 AM, Albert Astals Cid <aa...@kde.org> wrote: > > El Dissabte, 20 d'abril de 2013, a les 18:07:20, Jaydeep Solanki va > > > > escriure: > > > I would go for webkit, because as HTML develops webkit developers will > > > improve it where as in QTextDocument case it's not sure that it will > > > come > > > up with the latest standards. Or if we try to improve it and maintain > > > it, > > > the maintenance load will increase. > > > Also I looked at other ePub viewers such as calibre and it too uses > > > > webkit. > > > > > I did some tests and webkit seems to be working out of the box. > > > > What do you mean with "some tests"? > > I wrote a small test app, that renders epub using webkit, it works well, as > expected. > And for the QTextDocument one I edited Okular source, to see if small > tricks like setting the 'whole html' again when any css property for body > tag appears, worked? But it was not efficient and as such it was a > workaround not the proper way of doing it, which would lead to adding more > such workarounds when more bugs of such kind arise.So I finally settled on > webkit. > > > > BTW, I had a doubt, as currently every generator gives a QTextDocument, > > > > do > > > > > we have to change all of the generators to make it work with webkit, or > > > just the specific ePub one ? > > > > What do you think? > > I think it should be only the ePub generator, because if it's otherwise, I > guess I have a lot to do this summer :-)
That's the wrong answer. Google Summer of Code is not a way for you to get money. Google Summer of Code is a way for Okular to be improved. Now think about the project, not about yourself and try to answer the question again. > > I also wanted to ask, if it is fine if I submit my proposal as soon as the > student application period starts? which is probably less than 24 hours > from now. Why wouldn't it be fine? Albert > > Cheers, > Jaydeep > > > Cheers, > > > > Albert > > > > > Cheers, > > > Jaydeep > > > > > > On Fri, Apr 19, 2013 at 2:54 AM, Albert Astals Cid <aa...@kde.org> > > > > wrote: > > > > El Dijous, 18 d'abril de 2013, a les 23:49:00, Jaydeep Solanki va > > > > escriure: > > > > > Incase my previous mail didn't reach you because of heavy > > > > > attachment, > > > > > > > > here > > > > > > > > > is another one. > > > > > Hello, > > > > > I would be really happy if you can review the proposal that I have > > > > > > > > created. > > > > > > > > > Proposal link : http://db.tt/7pynIIKN > > > > > > > > Looks correct, one way of improving it would be doing some of the > > > > preliminary > > > > work to see if you'd prefer to go the QTextDocument or the Wekbit > > > > route. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > > > Albert > > > > > > > > > Thank you. > > > > > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > Jaydeep Solanki > > > > > > > > _______________________________________________ > > > > Okular-devel mailing list > > > > Okular-devel@kde.org > > > > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel > > > > _______________________________________________ > > Okular-devel mailing list > > Okular-devel@kde.org > > https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel _______________________________________________ Okular-devel mailing list Okular-devel@kde.org https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel