-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126842/#review92275
-----------------------------------------------------------



I didn't notice this review request and did porting on my own. My patch takes 
into account some things your doesn't at the moment. Can you port the version 
checks and possibly other changes from my RR to your patch, so I can close my 
review request?

https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/127049/

- Armin K.


On Jan. 22, 2016, 12:31 p.m., Michael Palimaka wrote:
> 
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126842/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> 
> (Updated Jan. 22, 2016, 12:31 p.m.)
> 
> 
> Review request for Okular.
> 
> 
> Repository: okular
> 
> 
> Description
> -------
> 
> Some small changes are required to ensure build passes with ECM's new 
> FindPoppler.cmake.
> 
> 
> Diffs
> -----
> 
>   CMakeLists.txt 492de006c58904f0da94f4cfb9e2ca79ab839c45 
>   cmake/modules/FindPoppler.cmake 80a78627438703a9db4d7cd97649098c41b1b2ce 
>   generators/CMakeLists.txt ce1d9bfeeb401466c47648d1d828fbd2ff4b18f6 
>   generators/poppler/CMakeLists.txt 740b6fd8d6311bee80845a034bba148d443afbd4 
> 
> Diff: https://git.reviewboard.kde.org/r/126842/diff/
> 
> 
> Testing
> -------
> 
> Builds, PDFs still open.
> 
> 
> Thanks,
> 
> Michael Palimaka
> 
>

_______________________________________________
Okular-devel mailing list
Okular-devel@kde.org
https://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/okular-devel

Reply via email to