Let me take a look at it. The feature needs a lot of work anyway. Will
take some time, though.
-Akara
Harold Lim wrote:
Hi Akara,
I did what the doc said but I'm getting a weird behavior.
My run.xml looks something like this:
<fa:runControl>
<fa:rampUp>60</fa:rampUp>
<fa:variableLoad>true</fa:variableLoad>
<fa:variableLoadFile>/root/faban/config/profiles/test/variableFile</fa:variableLoadFile>
<fa:steadyState>3600</fa:steadyState>
<fa:rampDown>60</fa:rampDown>
</fa:runControl>
My variableFile:
1200, 300
1200, 400
1200, 500
The behavior I'm getting is Faban runs the variable load first, then after running
the variable load, it then starts ramping up->steady state -> ramp down.
10:28:25 shirako067 INFO Variable load controller thread started!
10:28:25 shirako067 INFO Variable load controller thread
advanced!
10:28:25 shirako067 INFO Variable load controller thread
sleeping for 1200 seconds. Setting for 300 active threads.
10:48:25 shirako067 INFO Variable load controller thread
advanced!
10:48:25 shirako067 INFO Variable load controller thread
sleeping for 1200 seconds. Setting for 400 active threads
11:08:25 shirako067 INFO Variable load controller thread
advanced!
11:08:25 shirako067 INFO Variable load controller thread
sleeping for 1200 seconds. Setting for 500 active threads.
11:28:25 shirako067 INFO Started all threads; run commences in
2964 ms
11:28:29 INFO Ramp up started
11:29:28 shirako067 INFO Ramp up completed
...
-Harold
--- On Thu, 9/3/09, Akara Sucharitakul <[email protected]> wrote:
From: Akara Sucharitakul <[email protected]>
Subject: Re: Question about Olio/Faban
To: [email protected]
Date: Thursday, September 3, 2009, 12:54 PM
Yes, but the feature is still quite
restrictive. We're building it out better in the future.
Please see how to do it here. Let us know if you run into
problems.
http://faban.sunsource.net/1.0/docs/howdoi/loadvariation.html
Adding yet another Faban instance altogether will cause
conflicts.
-Akara
Harold Lim wrote:
Hi All,
Is it possible in Faban to increase the number of
concurrent users in the middle of the run? If not, is it
possible to run 2 Faban instance (maybe on different
machines) and run the other benchmark run after the first
one is running a while? Will it cause any problems on
the faban agents side if 2 instances are talking to
it?
I'm interested to see how the response time
behaves/pattern when the number of concurrent users change.
Thanks,
Harold
