Hi Akara, I downloaded the latest Faban and I think I'm still getting that behavior.
12:51:08 shirako067 INFO Configuring 1 JavaUIDriverAgents... 12:59:28 shirako067 INFO JavaUIDriverAgent[0]: Successfully started 500 driver threads. 12:59:29 shirako067 INFO Variable load controller thread started! 12:59:29 shirako067 INFO Variable load controller thread advanced! 12:59:29 shirako067 INFO Variable load controller thread sleeping for 1200 seconds. Setting for 300 active threads. It goes to the variable load controller before the ramp-up. -Harold --- On Fri, 9/18/09, Akara Sucharitakul <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Akara Sucharitakul <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: Question about Olio/Faban > To: [email protected] > Date: Friday, September 18, 2009, 3:44 PM > I checked real quick for the behavior > of the variable load and with the > current source, I don't think this behavior would be there. > The threads > get started and notifies the master before it goes into the > load > variation so you should not see the log sequence as you > send me before. > Can you check whether you have an older Faban build? If so, > can you > please upgrade to 1.0RC1 (on http://faban.sunsource.net/). > > As for results, the final results will not tell you much. > You should > rather enable the runtime stats in your run confirguration > file. Search > for <runtimeStats enabled="true|false">. It will > periodically dump out > the current stats into the logs (I know this also needs > improvement). > Thanks. > > -Akara > > Harold Lim wrote: > > I'm curious as to whether the final figure/data will > capture the variable workload or just ramp up -> steady > state -> ramp down data. > > > > I'm interested in the response time graph of the > variable load. > > > > > > > > -Harold > > > > > > --- On Fri, 9/18/09, Akara Sucharitakul <[email protected]> > wrote: > > > >> From: Akara Sucharitakul <[email protected]> > >> Subject: Re: Question about Olio/Faban > >> To: [email protected] > >> Date: Friday, September 18, 2009, 3:16 PM > >> Let me take a look at it. The feature > >> needs a lot of work anyway. Will > >> take some time, though. > >> > >> -Akara > >> > >> Harold Lim wrote: > >>> Hi Akara, > >>> > >>> I did what the doc said but I'm getting a > weird > >> behavior. > >>> My run.xml looks something like this: > >>> > >>> <fa:runControl> > >>> <fa:rampUp>60</fa:rampUp> > >>> > <fa:variableLoad>true</fa:variableLoad> > >>> > >> > <fa:variableLoadFile>/root/faban/config/profiles/test/variableFile</fa:variableLoadFile> > >>> > <fa:steadyState>3600</fa:steadyState> > >>> <fa:rampDown>60</fa:rampDown> > >>> </fa:runControl> > >>> > >>> My variableFile: > >>> 1200, 300 > >>> 1200, 400 > >>> 1200, 500 > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> The behavior I'm getting is Faban runs the > variable > >> load first, then after running the variable load, > it then > >> starts ramping up->steady state -> ramp > down. > >>> 10:28:25 shirako067 > >> INFO > Variable load > >> controller thread started! > >>> 10:28:25 shirako067 > >> INFO > Variable load > >> controller thread advanced! > >>> 10:28:25 shirako067 > >> INFO > Variable load > >> controller thread sleeping for 1200 seconds. > Setting for 300 > >> active threads. > >>> 10:48:25 shirako067 > >> INFO > Variable load > >> controller thread advanced! > >>> 10:48:25 shirako067 > >> INFO > Variable load > >> controller thread sleeping for 1200 seconds. > Setting for 400 > >> active threads > >>> 11:08:25 shirako067 > >> INFO > Variable load > >> controller thread advanced! > >>> 11:08:25 shirako067 > >> INFO > Variable load > >> controller thread sleeping for 1200 seconds. > Setting for 500 > >> active threads. > >>> 11:28:25 shirako067 > >> INFO > Started all > >> threads; run commences in 2964 ms > >>> 11:28:29 > >> INFO Ramp up started > >>> 11:29:28 shirako067 > >> INFO > Ramp up > >> completed > >>> ... > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> -Harold > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> --- On Thu, 9/3/09, Akara Sucharitakul <[email protected]> > >> wrote: > >>>> From: Akara Sucharitakul <[email protected]> > >>>> Subject: Re: Question about Olio/Faban > >>>> To: [email protected] > >>>> Date: Thursday, September 3, 2009, 12:54 > PM > >>>> Yes, but the feature is still quite > >>>> restrictive. We're building it out better > in the > >> future. > >>>> Please see how to do it here. Let us know > if you > >> run into > >>>> problems. > >>>> > >>>> http://faban.sunsource.net/1.0/docs/howdoi/loadvariation.html > >>>> > >>>> Adding yet another Faban instance > altogether will > >> cause > >>>> conflicts. > >>>> > >>>> -Akara > >>>> > >>>> Harold Lim wrote: > >>>>> Hi All, > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> Is it possible in Faban to increase > the number > >> of > >>>> concurrent users in the middle of the run? > If not, > >> is it > >>>> possible to run 2 Faban instance (maybe > on > >> different > >>>> machines) and run the other benchmark run > after > >> the first > >>>> one is running a while? Will it cause any > problems > >> on > >>>> the faban agents side if 2 instances > are > >> talking to > >>>> it? > >>>>> I'm interested to see how the response > time > >>>> behaves/pattern when the number of > concurrent > >> users change. > >>>>> Thanks, > >>>>> Harold > >>>>> > >>>>> > >>>>> > > >>> > >>> > >> > > > > > > > >
