Chris Rowley skrev 2014-05-15 08.05:
Hello all,
I did a little exploratory work in anticipation of tomorrow’s chat.
On 3 May 2014, at 20:53, Michael Kohlhase<[email protected]>
wrote:
I have done some triaging already and closed some, but there are quite a
few still interesting. Maybe you can also have a look (and/or suggest
that others do that as well on the mailing list)
So I looked at:
http://trac.mathweb.org/OM3/report/9
There are 72 entries, only 5 of which are not classified as ‘new’ -- whilst
most are in fact by now
at least 4 years old.
Thus almost all of these were initiated by members of the current group many
years ago.
Mostly by just one: Michael!! James also has a noticeable number, Christoph a
few and David just one.
Collating by "owner" is a probably bit skewed; I suspect Michael is getting
them by default. If instead collating by reporter:
https://trac.mathweb.org/OM3/query?status=assigned&status=new&status=reopened&group=reporter&col=id&col=summary&col=status&col=owner&col=type&col=priority&col=reporter&order=priority
I get Christoph as winner with 35, Michael as second with 23, and far behind
polx (5), me (4), jauecker (3), and James (2).
A not-very-daring conjecture is also that this reflects how familiar people
are with using this particular trac server. ;-)
REQUEST:
It would probably be most efficient if the relevant members of this group look
quickly here at those labelled
‘new’ that they initiated
Does that mean reporter now?
/Lars Hellström
(and are more than a year old) and triage them as:
- should have been closed or otherwise discarded long ago;
- need checking (also maybe suggest best person to do this);
- definitely still need attention.
I suspect that most are in the first category.
Thanks for you attention!
chris
_______________________________________________
Om3 mailing list
[email protected]
http://openmath.org/mailman/listinfo/om3
_______________________________________________
Om3 mailing list
[email protected]
http://openmath.org/mailman/listinfo/om3
