Thanks, Lars. Yes I had misunderstood the canned report that I used. So now I have learnt how to roll it myself, and found that this one with dates is quite useful:
https://trac.mathweb.org/OM3/query?status=assigned&status=new&time=..&group=reporter&col=id&col=summary&col=status&col=owner&col=type&col=priority&col=time&col=changetime&col=reporter&order=priority !! And many many thanks to Christoph for looking at all 35 of his already! It is not clear what the status of ‘owner’ meant 6 or 3 years ago, but it may still be relevant to some reports. In particular for those repotted by non-members of the current group: 'polx’ (who also still is owner of some) and ‘jauecker’. chris On 15 May 2014, at 17:49, Lars Hellström <[email protected]> wrote: > Chris Rowley skrev 2014-05-15 08.05: >> Hello all, >> >> I did a little exploratory work in anticipation of tomorrow’s chat. >> >> On 3 May 2014, at 20:53, Michael Kohlhase<[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> I have done some triaging already and closed some, but there are quite a >>> few still interesting. Maybe you can also have a look (and/or suggest >>> that others do that as well on the mailing list) >> >> So I looked at: >> >> http://trac.mathweb.org/OM3/report/9 >> >> There are 72 entries, only 5 of which are not classified as ‘new’ -- whilst >> most are in fact by now >> at least 4 years old. >> >> Thus almost all of these were initiated by members of the current group many >> years ago. >> >> Mostly by just one: Michael!! James also has a noticeable number, Christoph >> a few and David just one. > > Collating by "owner" is a probably bit skewed; I suspect Michael is getting > them by default. If instead collating by reporter: > > https://trac.mathweb.org/OM3/query?status=assigned&status=new&status=reopened&group=reporter&col=id&col=summary&col=status&col=owner&col=type&col=priority&col=reporter&order=priority > > I get Christoph as winner with 35, Michael as second with 23, and far behind > polx (5), me (4), jauecker (3), and James (2). > > A not-very-daring conjecture is also that this reflects how familiar people > are with using this particular trac server. ;-) > >> REQUEST: >> It would probably be most efficient if the relevant members of this group >> look quickly here at those labelled >> ‘new’ that they initiated > > Does that mean reporter now? > > /Lars Hellström > > >> (and are more than a year old) and triage them as: > >> - should have been closed or otherwise discarded long ago; >> >> - need checking (also maybe suggest best person to do this); >> >> - definitely still need attention. >> >> I suspect that most are in the first category. > > > >> Thanks for you attention! >> >> chris >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Om3 mailing list >> [email protected] >> http://openmath.org/mailman/listinfo/om3 >> > > > _______________________________________________ > Om3 mailing list > [email protected] > http://openmath.org/mailman/listinfo/om3 _______________________________________________ Om3 mailing list [email protected] http://openmath.org/mailman/listinfo/om3
