Am 10.12.14 um 17:20 schrieb Dan McDonald:
On Dec 10, 2014, at 11:12 AM, Stephan Budach <stephan.bud...@jvm.de> wrote:

Hi Dan,

I actually don't know the term "incantation" yet, but I assume, that you wanted 
to know the release of OmniOS I am running?
I meant what exact command-line arguments you typed for ipadm(1M).  But that's 
okay, because it's good to know the other things you're about to show me.

What is really funny, is that running pstack against the ipadm process, somehow 
brought things back in line:

root@nfsvmpool01:~# pkg info entire
          Name: entire
       Summary: Incorporation to constrain core system packages to same build
   Description: This package constrains core system package versions to the same
                build and provides a minimal set of additional packages.
         State: Installed
     Publisher: omnios
       Version: 11
Build Release: 5.11
        Branch: 0.151006
Packaging Date: Mon Oct 27 19:15:00 2014
          Size: 0.00 B
          FMRI: pkg://omnios/entire@11,5.11-0.151006:20141027T191500Z

I was running ipadm create-if ixgbe3 in another session when I ran pstack as 
suggested:

root@nfsvmpool01:~# pstack `pgrep ipadm`
12397:    ipadm create-if ixgbe3
fef07723 open     (8047190, 2, fec9404c)
feef24f8 open     (8047190, 2, fec9404c, 8068db8, 11, feffb0a4) + 105
fec935f8 i_dlpi_open (8068db8, 80475dc, 10, 1, 8047f00, 5) + ed
fec93768 i_dlpi_style1_open (8068db0, 804761c, 20, fec9386d, 3, 3) + 2a
fec939a8 dlpi_open (8047f00, 8047cd4, 10, fedf1541) + 149
fedf17fb i_ipadm_plumb_if (8068968, 8047f00, 2, 3) + 2cb
fedf0ed4 i_ipadm_create_if (8068968, 8047f00, 2, 3, 0, 3) + 9a
fedf0fc2 ipadm_create_if (8068968, 8047f00, 0, 3) + e3
0805553e do_create_if (2) + 8f
08052e72 main     (80555ca, feffb0a4, 8047e30, 80525c7, 3, 8047e3c) + df
080525c7 _start   (3, 8047ef0, 8047ef6, 8047f00, 0, 8047f07) + 83

ipadm returned and created the interface, just as if nothing ever happened. 
Afterwards I was able to create and delete interfaces without any issue on the 
ixgbe adaptors.
That's VERY odd, albeit with pleasant results.  I wouldn't think pstack would 
unblock something like what you showed me.  You're running 006 (long-term 
support), but I'm not seeing any major changes in the plumbing of interfaces 
between then and now.
Yes, it is… ;)

You mentioned a desire to not reboot your system.  Did you plug in these ixgbes 
while booted (i.e. hotplugging)?  Or were they always there, and you just 
hadn't configured them until now?
The two cards had been in the system right from the start and I already configured one port (ixgbe0) to connect to a 10GbE port on our 6509, which went without issues. I wanted to resolve this issue without rebooting, since rebooting would have killed 53 VMs that are residing on my NFS export that is running over ixgbe0.
It seems like you tickled a race condition or some other odd combination of 
circumstances that inspecting the ipadm(1M) process jostled free.  I don't have 
any ixgbe handy at the moment, but had I, I'd like to know if this is a 
reproducible problem.  The only theory I can think of is that something weird 
happened while ipadm was communicating with ipmgmtd, and inspecting the process 
with pstack allowed a context switch to occur.
I can maybe help with that as well… I tried to set the MTU to the maximum, that the driver would accept and I ended up with a mtu of 15500 (what a odd number anyway) which I set using dladm on ixgbe3. When i tried to create the interface using ipadm, that was the moment, when things went quirky. Although I trimmed the mtu down to a reasonable 9216 ipadm wouldn't create any longer and would hang at creating interfaces on any of the remaining 3 ports of my T540-X2's.

Thank you, and while it's nice to see things working, I'm sorry I don't have a 
better explanation about what happened, or the ability to immediately reproduce 
this bug.

Dan

Ha ha, no prob - you already provided a great deal of help!

Thanks a lot,
budy
_______________________________________________
OmniOS-discuss mailing list
OmniOS-discuss@lists.omniti.com
http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss

Reply via email to