> On Jan 4, 2016, at 9:43 AM, Bob Friesenhahn <bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us> > wrote: > > Due to the libgomp availability issue, packages targeting OmniOS which > normally support OpenMP have OpenMP specifically disabled.
If this were a bigger thing, I'd worry about design-on-the-fly, but would it be perhaps reasonable to place libgomp in with the existing gcc-5-runtime? Or should it be its own? We could go either way on this, I think. If it becomes its own, the name would be likely named "system/library/gomp" or ".../libgomp". Opinions welcome! Dan _______________________________________________ OmniOS-discuss mailing list OmniOS-discuss@lists.omniti.com http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss
