Ah, bloating the total package count vs bloating the default installed file system, decisions, decisions :).
I think on this one I'd vote for a separate package. > On Jan 4, 2016, at 1:55 PM, Dan McDonald <dan...@omniti.com> wrote: > > >> On Jan 4, 2016, at 4:53 PM, Bob Friesenhahn <bfrie...@simple.dallas.tx.us> >> wrote: >> >> While OmniOS observes a 'KYSTY' philosophy, the default created OmniOS zone >> size still seems rather large. > > That can get fixed once we reform "entire". I was thinking that if it didn't > get included in gcc-5-runtime it'd NOT be in "entire". > >> Avoiding expanding this size should be part of the decision criteria. Other >> than that, including it in gcc-5-runtime would make things easier for >> packagers and avoid additional moving parts. > > And you've illuminated why it's not an obvious decision. Hence my putting > the question out here. > > Dan > > _______________________________________________ > OmniOS-discuss mailing list > OmniOS-discuss@lists.omniti.com > http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss _______________________________________________ OmniOS-discuss mailing list OmniOS-discuss@lists.omniti.com http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss
