hi dan great news ... a question ... for testing this, a vm would be fine, right?
cheers tobi Tobias Oetiker t...@oetiker.ch 062 775 9902 > On 09.08.2016, at 00:21, Dan McDonald <dan...@omniti.com> wrote: > > I just pushed two commits to io-lx-public: > > commit f35040a7b2d3acea4f879afbc7ae4d8bfa09b575 > Author: Dan McDonald <dan...@omniti.com> > Date: Mon Aug 8 17:17:31 2016 -0400 > > systemd kool-aid drinkers (e.g. Ubuntu 16) need proc_clock_highres > privileges > > commit 179ef6d69f69f2c5fb540fecf8cc3707168fb76f > Author: Dan McDonald <dan...@omniti.com> > Date: Thu Aug 4 10:47:33 2016 -0400 > > libdladm needs to be a bit more LX-aware > > > The most recent has allowed me to boot Ubuntu 16 *AND* CentOS 7.2 on an > OmniOS-hosted LX zone. > > I'll be merging with Joyent's stuff again relatively soon and preparing to > spin both a non-LX bloody update and an accompanying LX update on our LX > publisher: > > http://pkg.omniti.com/omnios/LX/ > > I've not heard from anyone, so I'm going to assume nobody has played with LX > zones on OmniOS yet. It's still "alpha/beta"-y IMHO, but I really could use > the feedback, especially from people with more Linux experience than me. (I > *rarely* have used UNIX variants outside of MacOS X and Solarish ones for the > past 20 years, and most of those exceptions were for IPsec interoperability > testing back when I was at Sun.) > > We're contemplating including "LX Beta" in OmniOS r151020, as preparation for > r151022 (i.e. the Next LTS release) to include LX zones. Your feedback > should be invaluable in helping us guide things in. > > Thanks, > Dan > > _______________________________________________ > OmniOS-discuss mailing list > OmniOS-discuss@lists.omniti.com > http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss > _______________________________________________ OmniOS-discuss mailing list OmniOS-discuss@lists.omniti.com http://lists.omniti.com/mailman/listinfo/omnios-discuss
