James C. McPherson wrote: > On Fri, 15 May 2009 14:47:27 +0300 > "C. Bergstr?m" <codestr0m at osunix.org> wrote: > > >> I'm auditing the source and found a couple closed binaries.. I say >> closed binaries because of the wording with the corresponding license >> for each. I'm not sure how this could be fixed, but maybe it's best >> these be moved to the closed binaries download in the future. >> >> usr/src/uts/common/io/usb/clients/hwa1480_fw/i1480/i1480-usb-0.0.bin >> usr/src/cmd/ucodeadm/amd-ucode.bin >> > > What exactly are you objecting to in the licensing? > This isn't a license objection.. More just that it doesn't seem appropriate to be in the source tree. It's not source and putting it there is misleading imho.. You've pointed out a few more that I haven't found yet.. Knowing all of these would be helpful.
Thanks ./C
