On Tue, 2009-08-04 at 09:39 -0600, Mark J. Nelson wrote: > Sebastien Roy wrote: > > I'd suggest something like: > > > > * Test Results > > * This section should contain enough information for the CRT > > advocate to evaluate if testing was adequate. Pointers to logs of > > automated tests or terminal output of manual tests are welcome, > > along with a high-level summary. For a simple fix, a description > > of the testing methodology is fine. In all cases, a statement of > > the form, "I tested the code and it passed" is inadequate. > > That's more explicit than the existing text: "Developers are responsible > for validating their changes prior to integration. This work should be > described in the 'Test Results' section of the RTI." Will it drive the > desired behavior? Hard to tell. > > I'm fine with the suggested change. > > It seems like "rti nits" is evolving into "how to fill out an RTI > conscientiously." :)
Indeed. IMO, a "how to fill out an RTI conscientiously" document is very useful. :-) -Seb
