Hi Alex/Bin, I’m also witnessing the same problem in my cloud. My cloud is built using RedHat OSP10 (Newton).
Bottstrap log has below info. 2018-01-30 16:00:51 CFY <local> [security_group_38d63] Configuring node 2018-01-30 16:00:51 CFY <local> [private_net_85fe3] Configuring node 2018-01-30 16:00:51 CFY <local> [key_pair_31e7f] Configuring node 2018-01-30 16:00:51 CFY <local> [floatingip_vm00_474ed] Configuring node 2018-01-30 16:00:51 CFY <local> [key_pair_31e7f] Starting node 2018-01-30 16:00:51 CFY <local> [private_net_85fe3] Starting node 2018-01-30 16:00:51 CFY <local> [security_group_38d63] Starting node 2018-01-30 16:00:51 CFY <local> [floatingip_vm00_474ed] Starting node 2018-01-30 16:00:52 CFY <local> [fixedip_vm00_b112a] Creating node 2018-01-30 16:00:52 CFY <local> [dns_cm_3211b] Creating node 2018-01-30 16:00:52 CFY <local> [dns_vm00_3cba2] Creating node 2018-01-30 16:00:52 CFY <local> [dns_cm_3211b.create] Sending task 'dnsdesig.dns_plugin.aneeded' 2018-01-30 16:00:52 CFY <local> [dns_vm00_3cba2.create] Sending task 'dnsdesig.dns_plugin.aneeded' 2018-01-30 16:00:52 CFY <local> [fixedip_vm00_b112a.create] Sending task 'neutron_plugin.port.create' 2018-01-30 16:00:52 CFY <local> [dns_cm_3211b.create] Task started 'dnsdesig.dns_plugin.aneeded' 2018-01-30 16:00:52 CFY <local> [dns_vm00_3cba2.create] Task started 'dnsdesig.dns_plugin.aneeded' 2018-01-30 16:00:52 CFY <local> [dns_cm_3211b.create] Task failed 'dnsdesig.dns_plugin.aneeded' -> 'dns' 2018-01-30 16:00:52 CFY <local> 'install' workflow execution failed: Workflow failed: Task failed 'dnsdesig.dns_plugin.aneeded' -> 'dns' My AAI is already populated with both the pods info as shown below =================== { "cloud-region": [ { "cloud-owner": "pod25", "cloud-region-id": "regionOne", "cloud-type": "openstack", "owner-defined-type": "owner-defined-type", "cloud-region-version": "titanium_cloud", "identity-url": "http://10.0.14.1/api/multicloud-titanium_cloud/v0/pod25_regionOne/identity/v2.0", "cloud-zone": "cloud zone", "complex-name": "complex name", "resource-version": "1517257340971" }, { "cloud-owner": "pod25dns", "cloud-region-id": "regionOne", "cloud-type": "openstack", "owner-defined-type": "owner-defined-type", "cloud-region-version": "titanium_cloud", "identity-url": "http://10.0.14.1/api/multicloud-titanium_cloud/v0/pod25dns_regionOne/identity/v2.0", "cloud-zone": "cloud zone", "complex-name": "complex name2", "resource-version": "1517257341850" } ] } =================== And on designate I see the new zone getting created. Appreciate any hints/clues on how to overcome this problem. best regards, Ramu From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Alexis de Talhouët Sent: Friday, January 19, 2018 1:08 PM To: Yang, Bin <bin.y...@windriver.com> Cc: onap-discuss <onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [DCAGEN2] Proxied DNS Designate only with Multicloud Titanium Ah, I missed the fact that when it’s proxied, dcae_keystone_url needs to be the one from multivim. All good now. Alexis On Jan 19, 2018, at 11:05 AM, Alexis de Talhouët <adetalhoue...@gmail.com<mailto:adetalhoue...@gmail.com>> wrote: Hum, actually, the DNS zone registration works. But now, the boot container is failing with the following: 2018-01-19 15:52:53 CFY <local> [dns_cm_4834b.create] Sending task 'dnsdesig.dns_plugin.aneeded' 2018-01-19 15:52:53 CFY <local> [dns_vm00_73f5a.create] Sending task 'dnsdesig.dns_plugin.aneeded' 2018-01-19 15:52:53 CFY <local> [fixedip_vm00_91a2f] Creating node 2018-01-19 15:52:53 CFY <local> [dns_cm_4834b.create] Task started 'dnsdesig.dns_plugin.aneeded' 2018-01-19 15:52:53 CFY <local> [dns_vm00_73f5a.create] Task started 'dnsdesig.dns_plugin.aneeded' 2018-01-19 15:52:53 CFY <local> [dns_cm_4834b.create] Task failed 'dnsdesig.dns_plugin.aneeded' -> 'dns' 2018-01-19 15:52:53 CFY <local> 'install' workflow execution failed: Workflow failed: Task failed 'dnsdesig.dns_plugin.aneeded' -> 'dns' Workflow failed: Task failed 'dnsdesig.dns_plugin.aneeded' -> ‘dns' Of course, the OpenStack on which I deploy DCAE doesn’t support DNS Designate, I’m wondering what I could have missed? Alexis On Jan 19, 2018, at 10:46 AM, Alexis de Talhouët <adetalhoue...@gmail.com<mailto:adetalhoue...@gmail.com>> wrote: Bin, Awesome, I got it to work with my OpenStack Pike instance. One issue though, the register_multicloud_pod25dns_with_aai() is using hardcoded username/password https://gerrit.onap.org/r/gitweb?p=demo.git;a=blob;f=boot/dcae2_vm_init.sh;h=b071dffd53f0a431bbdff1c1228edce8ecddef2d;hb=refs/heads/amsterdam I opened DCAEGEN2-270<https://jira.onap.org/browse/DCAEGEN2-270> and submitted the fix https://gerrit.onap.org/r/#/c/28673/ Current workaround is to push the data in AAI prior to having the script running. So the put request will fail, but the validation will pass. Alexis On Jan 19, 2018, at 12:10 AM, Yang, Bin <bin.y...@windriver.com<mailto:bin.y...@windriver.com>> wrote: Hi Alexis, Please refer to answers embedded below Best Regards, Bin Yang, Solution Readiness Team, Wind River Direct +86,10,84777126 Mobile +86,13811391682 Fax +86,10,64398189 Skype: yangbincs993 -----Original Message----- From: Alexis de Talhouët [mailto:adetalhoue...@gmail.com] Sent: Friday, January 19, 2018 10:30 AM To: Yang, Bin Cc: onap-discuss Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [DCAGEN2] Proxied DNS Designate only with Multicloud Titanium Hi Bin, So if I understand correctly, I should register the VIM in multi cloud (do you have an example or a link on how to ) and DCAE will be able to use it to proxy DNS request (DNSaaS) to this instance. I was under the impression it was hard coded to pod25 in the DCAE boostrap script, I’ll look again. [Bin] Yes, pod25 was hard coded in DCAE bootstrap script, but it is just the cloud owner name, most related information that DCAE bootstrap uses to register a VIM instance are passed by HEAT template ( I believe OOM could support that parameter injection , correct?) I’m glad this is already there then, I guess I got confused while reading the script. I’ll try this tomorrow. [Bin] I think it is the hardcoded 'titanium_cloud' in that script to confuse you. This could be changed to be a parameter passing by HEAT/OOM. But right now MultiCloud plugin for titanium_cloud support vanilla OpenStack version like ocata, mitaka, newton as well. I didn't try the pike, but there is big chance that pike can be supported without any modification. So you confirm I can already use the proxy setup provided by DCAE to use a proxy for DNS Desginate other than the OpenLab one? I have OpenStack Pike, would that work? [Bin] I didn't test with pike yet, you can give it a try . OOM does already provide the support for this in Amsterdam. I guess what I was looking for is a proxy setup using plain OpenStack APIs. and not using Multicloud. But I’m all in for using Multicloud if available and working already. [Bin]: I do think it will be valuable that OOM provide such kind of support and I can share what I learned and hope you get more comprehensive understanding of the requirement/solutions. Thanks, Alexis On Jan 18, 2018, at 8:58 PM, Yang, Bin <bin.y...@windriver.com<mailto:bin.y...@windriver.com>> wrote: Hi Alexis, I think it would be better to clarify that: proxy the DNS Designate requests is the enhanced feature by MultiCloud to federate services from different underlying VIM instances. In ONAP Amsterdam release it has been implemented to support both vanilla OpenStack Ocata (and Newton as well, not tested yet) and Titanium Cloud, and more to come in future releases. I had tested with vanilla OpenStack Ocata and it works well. To utilize it , the consumer presuppose that the MultiCloud services are ready and the VIM instances are registered. So for DCAEgen2 which has been the actually consumer in ONAP Amsterdam release, the bootstrap VM did this part , the VIM instance information (both underlying OpenStack and the proxied one which exposes Designate services) are passed in by HEAT template/environment file. I believe OOM can support this in similar way. This federation can be designed/implemented in various way but why it was designed/implemented is that MultiCloud do the federation and the consumers will be transparent with regards who provides DNSaaS services. BTW, I do think it will be valuable that OOM can offer the similar proxy to DNS designate, I would like to share our experiences. Best Regards, Bin Yang, Solution Readiness Team, Wind River Direct +86,10,84777126 Mobile +86,13811391682 Fax +86,10,64398189 Skype: yangbincs993 -----Original Message----- From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org> [mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Alexis de Talhouët Sent: Friday, January 19, 2018 6:34 AM To: onap-discuss Subject: [onap-discuss] [DCAGEN2] Proxied DNS Designate only with Multicloud Titanium Hi experts, In the dcae_vm_init.sh script, we have the possibility to proxy the DNS Designate requests to an OpenStack other than the one on which we spawn DCAE. But this feature only allow to proxy to Multicloud Titanium cloud, it doesn’t allow to proxy to an other plain OpenStack instance. I was wondering whether a contribution to address this is Amsterdam would be accepted, if yes, I can do it. Basically, I’d like to leverage the dnaas_* config bits to establish a connection to an OpenStack directly, instead of using Multi-cloud. I would have a add a param to let the user choose whether the use Multicloud Titanium or plain OpenStack. Please, let me know what you think of this? FYI, I tend to think we should be able to have DNS Designate running where ever we want in the infra, as long as it’s provided. Moreover, we’re working on providing it in OOM, so it’s not required in ppl infra. Thanks, Alexis _______________________________________________ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss
_______________________________________________ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.onap.org https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss