Hi Jessie, Maybe I can help clarify this. Per the discussion of the resource IM interest group, the “obsolete” is intended to follow the definitions of the IISOMI modeling guidelines as you stated below for the time being. I think the intention of the proposal is to mark those attributes/datatypes as “obsolete” but not removed for R3, and perhaps remove them in R4, which fits the definition. Alex, you can confirm whether I interpreted it correctly.
For others who haven’t attend the resource IM call, please noted that the “lifecycle” stereotype of the model is still under discussion. The interest group just agrees that the IISOMI definition of “obsolete” fits the current intention of the proposal and decides to use the term. BR, Xu From: onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-discuss-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of jessie jewitt Sent: Thursday, June 14, 2018 12:05 AM To: denghui (L) <denghu...@huawei.com> Cc: onap-discuss@lists.onap.org; onap-tsc <onap-...@lists.onap.org> Subject: Re: [onap-discuss] [modeling] Call for approval on the “obsolete legacy attributes/datatypes” proposal for the resource IM Hello Deng Hui- Could you please clarify something for me. The ETSI "applied stereotype", on which this column in the wiki table is based, has "obsolete" as an artifact lifecycle option, with its definition supplied in the IISOMI Modeling Guidelines. This is the definition of "obsolete" in those guidelines. Is this what we should interpret this to mean? Will the entity be kept in the model for at least one further release? Thanks for your guidance, Jessie · Obsolete This stereotype indicates that the entity should not be used in new implementation and that attempts should be made to remove it from existing implementation. The entity should be kept in the model for at least one further release. The team has to decide on a case by case basis when to remove it from the model. On Wed, Jun 13, 2018 at 8:23 AM, denghui (L) <denghu...@huawei.com<mailto:denghu...@huawei.com>> wrote: Hello all, This is 1 week’s call for approval on the “obsolete legacy attributes/datatypes” proposal for the resource IM. The intention is to mark several attributes/datatypes of the current model as “obsoleted” as their functionalities are covered by some other attributes. Detailed information of the proposal can be found at: https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Obsolete+Legacy+Attributes , the proposed changes are marked in red. Thanks a lot for your review Best regards, DENG Hui _______________________________________________ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-discuss@lists.onap.org> https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss
_______________________________________________ onap-discuss mailing list onap-discuss@lists.onap.org https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-discuss
