On MVP and text in below email from Bryan,  Clarification as to what an MVP is 
as the target for the end of the incubation phase. Believe, that's where we 
need to some element of Product Management.

thanks & regards,
Dhananjay Pavgi
Mobile : +91 98220 22264
[cid:image002.png at 01CE7323.F2727500]               [ONAP_logo_Sig]
www.techmahindra.com<http://www.techmahindra.com/>                 Platinum 
Member. Visit : http://www.onap.org<http://www.onap.org/>

From: onap-tsc-bounces at lists.onap.org 
[mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Terrill
Sent: Thursday, April 20, 2017 12:32 AM
To: SULLIVAN, BRYAN L <bs3131 at att.com>; Christopher Donley (Chris) 
<Christopher.Donley at huawei.com>; onap-tsc at lists.onap.org
Cc: Ed Warnicke <eaw at cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Updated TSC Charter

Hi,

Thanks for the comments Bryan.  On responding comment in the "incubation" and 
MVP definition and that is on the proposed addition of "That is (or can be) 
used in a production environment".  The use in a "production environment" is 
also subject to whatever additions and support is required.   I can agree that 
MVP is subject to the same question in that its very subjective.  Its not 
obvious to phrase in a non-subjective way, but we could remove MVP and  go with 
"Project has resources, but is recognized to be in an early stage of 
development and not generally considered suitable to a production environment."

I'm ok with the contributor clarification.

Best Regards,

Steve.

From: onap-tsc-bounces at lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc-bounces at 
lists.onap.org> [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of SULLIVAN, 
BRYAN L
Sent: 19 April 2017 19:12
To: Christopher Donley (Chris) <Christopher.Donley at 
huawei.com<mailto:Christopher.Donley at huawei.com>>; onap-tsc at 
lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc at lists.onap.org>
Cc: Ed Warnicke <eaw at cisco.com<mailto:eaw at cisco.com>>
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Updated TSC Charter

Chris,

Not sure I can post to the TSC list, but here are some comments in the draft:

*         Each project will have its own code repositories (one or multiple),...

o   The concept of an umbrella project may address this, but that's an overhead 
that should be optional. It may be more effective in some cases for projects 
just to have multiple repos.

*         A Contributor is someone who contributes code or other artifacts to a 
project, and reviews the contributions of others. Contributors are not 
necessarily from Member companies.

o   We should encourage and recognize all forms of contribution, especially 
reviews. IMO contributors may provide *no* code but still contribute valuable 
advice on architecture, quality, testability, or other contributions of a 
non-code/artifact nature.

*         Committer rights for a project are earned via code contribution ...

o   The potential pool of committers should go beyond just code contribution, 
given the merit of their other types of contributions

*         (description of Incubation phase) Project has resources, but is 
recognized to be in early stages of development, having yet to achieve a MVP 
(Minimum Viable Product) that is (or can be) used in production environments.

o   Clarification as to what an MVP is as the target for the end of the 
incubation phase.

*         Other editorial items


Thanks,
Bryan Sullivan | AT&T

From: onap-tsc-bounces at lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc-bounces at 
lists.onap.org> [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of 
Christopher Donley (Chris)
Sent: Wednesday, April 19, 2017 8:45 AM
To: onap-tsc at lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc at lists.onap.org>
Cc: Ed Warnicke <eaw at cisco.com<mailto:eaw at cisco.com>>
Subject: [onap-tsc] Updated TSC Charter

Dear TSC,

On behalf of the Charter drafting team, please find attached an updated version 
of the TSC Charter incorporating your suggestions and feedback from the last 
review.  We have attempted to highlight the open issues that need a decision 
from the TSC.  We are sending this draft with the intention that you review it 
in preparation for discussion and voting during our next TSC meeting.

Chris, Steve, Ed, Lingli, Alla, and Phil
============================================================================================================================

Disclaimer:  This message and the information contained herein is proprietary 
and confidential and subject to the Tech Mahindra policy statement, you may 
review the policy at http://www.techmahindra.com/Disclaimer.html 
<http://www.techmahindra.com/Disclaimer.html> externally 
http://tim.techmahindra.com/tim/disclaimer.html 
<http://tim.techmahindra.com/tim/disclaimer.html> internally within 
TechMahindra.

============================================================================================================================
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: 
<http://lists.onap.org/pipermail/onap-tsc/attachments/20170420/512d8a05/attachment-0001.html>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image001.png
Type: image/png
Size: 4909 bytes
Desc: image001.png
URL: 
<http://lists.onap.org/pipermail/onap-tsc/attachments/20170420/512d8a05/attachment-0001.png>
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: image002.jpg
Type: image/jpeg
Size: 7337 bytes
Desc: image002.jpg
URL: 
<http://lists.onap.org/pipermail/onap-tsc/attachments/20170420/512d8a05/attachment-0001.jpg>

Reply via email to