Hi Steve, all, Common Frameworks status: it is clarified under the project definition https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=6589597 that:
The project will include the following infrastructure: 1. DmaaP<https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=3247130&src=contextnavpagetreemode> (project promoted to stand-alone) 2. Extensibility<https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=5734935&src=contextnavpagetreemode> (project withdrawn) 3. Logging<https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Logging+Enhancements+Project+Proposal> (project promoted to stand-alone) 4. Authorization and Authentication Framework<https://wiki.onap.org/pages/viewpage.action?pageId=3247151&src=contextnavpagetreemode> (project promoted to stand-alone) Thus, each one of these sub-projects has its own status and that status is clarified. I think it would be better to keep as is, as Common Frameworks can't be considered rejected, approved, or withdrawn. Best regards, Alla Goldner Open Network Division Amdocs Technology [cid:image001.png@01D2F2AB.A19F3260] From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Stephen Terrill Sent: Saturday, July 01, 2017 8:39 PM To: onap-tsc <onap-tsc@lists.onap.org> Subject: [onap-tsc] Projects status on wiki. Hi All, I was looking over the project (approved, proposed, etc) and had a few observations. In the approved projects: - We have approved the openlab project (https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Open+Lab), but I couldn't see that in the approved project list. I assume that should be added (approved in the TSC on June 22) In draft projects: - I believe Reference VNF project can be approved as it is part of integration now. I assume it could be considered withdrawn??? - ONAP operations manager/ONAP on containers is a project that lacks clarity to me. It was proposed as a sub-project under ONAP OOM, however is it something that we should assume directly or need to discuss?? - We need to discuss Common Frameworks, I believe from comments that it is considered withdrawn, however it would be good if the authors clarified that. - The application authorization framework is still there (and in the approved projects). I assume its just part of the backlog to clean up as this was recent. BR, Steve [Ericsson]<http://www.ericsson.com/> STEPHEN TERRILL Technology Specialist DUIC, Systems and Technology Development Unit IP & Cloud Business Unit, IT & Cloud Products Ericsson Ericsson R&D Center, via de los Poblados 13 28033, Madrid, Spain Phone +34 339 3005 Mobile +34 609 168 515 stephen.terr...@ericsson.com<mailto:stephen.terr...@ericsson.com> www.ericsson.com<http://www.ericsson.com> [http://www.ericsson.com/current_campaign]<http://www.ericsson.com/current_campaign> Legal entity: Ericsson España S.A, compay registration number ESA288568603. This Communication is Confidential. We only send and receive email on the basis of the terms set out at www.ericsson.com/email_disclaimer<http://www.ericsson.com/email_disclaimer> This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement, you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer <https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer>
_______________________________________________ ONAP-TSC mailing list ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc
