Lingli and team Can we please focus on the R1 use cases and ensure that we have solid flows for the use cases against the integrated architecture. This needs to be communicated with the PTLs this week.
thanks mazin On Jul 10, 2017, at 5:51 AM, Lingli Deng <denglin...@chinamobile.com<mailto:denglin...@chinamobile.com>> wrote: Hi Alla, Thanks for the clarifications. If the focus is not R1 specific and not urgent, I suppose we could keep it bi-weekly for now. Thanks, Lingli From: Alla Goldner [mailto:alla.gold...@amdocs.com] Sent: 2017年7月10日 15:54 To: Lingli Deng <denglin...@chinamobile.com<mailto:denglin...@chinamobile.com>>; 'BEGWANI, VIMAL' <vb1...@att.com<mailto:vb1...@att.com>>; onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org> Cc: onap-disc...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-disc...@lists.onap.org>; 'onap-tsc' <onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>> Subject: RE: [onap-tsc] Use case subcommittee - agenda for the upcoming meeting this Monday Hi Lingli, Thanks a lot for your feedback. I fully agree with you that R1 discussions should be prioritized. You can see that this item (R1 use cases (vCPE and vVoLTE): Status, Open issues, required actions) appears before the R2 use cases discussions. However, we should limit this discussion to Status, Open issues and required actions, as mentioned, during Use case subcommittee meeting, for the following reasons: 1. As agreed for R1 (there were quite a few discussions and emails shared by a different people in this regard), we have R1 expedited process, by which, upon use cases approval, responsibility on use cases coordination moved to Integration project. This results in a different meetings between use cases leaders and the respective involved projects. BTW, the feedback I am getting so far as that this work has been very productive, for both approved use cases. 1. In order to analyse different projects dependencies and affected functionalities, technical issues should be discussed with people working on a different projects. The reason is that projects’ expertise is within a project, not within Use case subcommittee. We can’t force all projects’ ALL representatives to attend Use case subcommittee, while, only if all people working on specific project participate in discussion, we can have full functional coverage and appropriate split of responsibilities. 1. We do need start talking about R2 use cases, in order to have our proposal ready for TSC review in advance before R2 starts, in order to align correctly and on time with R2 goals. 2 weeks ago I raised question on whether we should move to weekly use case subcommittee meetings. No response was received. I will raise it again today during the meeting, as, in my understanding, such a move is needed in order to allow a comprehensive coverage. Best regards, Alla Goldner Open Network Division Amdocs Technology <image001.png> From: Lingli Deng [mailto:denglin...@chinamobile.com] Sent: Monday, July 10, 2017 9:41 AM To: Alla Goldner <alla.gold...@amdocs.com<mailto:alla.gold...@amdocs.com>>; 'BEGWANI, VIMAL' <vb1...@att.com<mailto:vb1...@att.com>>; onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org> Cc: onap-disc...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-disc...@lists.onap.org>; 'onap-tsc' <onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>> Subject: RE: [onap-tsc] Use case subcommittee - agenda for the upcoming meeting this Monday Hi Alla, I wonder if we should prioritize the R1 usecase discussion in this time slot. Currently, there are ad hoc meetings arranged respectively for VoLTE and CPE usecases, which makes people rather frustrating and not efficient because it is really hard to allocate a common time slot for cross project discussion, which I believe would be improved much if we host such discussion in this subcommittee, which to my understanding is the top priority. Thanks, Lingli From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org> [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Alla Goldner Sent: 2017年7月8日 0:59 To: BEGWANI, VIMAL <vb1...@att.com<mailto:vb1...@att.com>>; onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org> Cc: onap-disc...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-disc...@lists.onap.org>; onap-tsc <onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>> Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Use case subcommittee - agenda for the upcoming meeting this Monday Hi, Vimal, Yes, of course, happy to do that. Here is the updated agenda: 1. Review of suggested Use case subcommittee flow of operation as documented here https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Usecase+subcommittee<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_display_DW_Usecase-2Bsubcommittee&d=DwMFAw&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=YQZaNPLN15xk3BWcVl7k8w&m=fJeFF2gsoUxIvMSd7LwlFJm195aQf6PCsGoLcOOJcVs&s=_gs9OYnZ5I93MA1QgqXnFJ9luEVCYalLple1Iynub1w&e=> , “Use case subcommittee flow” 2. R1 use cases (vCPE and vVoLTE): Status, Open issues, required actions 3. R2 use cases: the initial proposals * Network Function Change Management? * Enterprise vCPE? * 5G i. RAN deployment ii. E2E Network Slicing * More? 1. AOB Best regards, Alla Goldner Open Network Division Amdocs Technology <image001.png> From: BEGWANI, VIMAL [mailto:vb1...@att.com] Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 7:53 PM To: Alla Goldner <alla.gold...@amdocs.com<mailto:alla.gold...@amdocs.com>>; onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org> Cc: onap-disc...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-disc...@lists.onap.org>; onap-tsc <onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>> Subject: RE: [onap-tsc] Use case subcommittee - agenda for the upcoming meeting this Monday Alla, We are still in an initial discussion, but I would like to add 5G RAN deployment and E2E Network Slicing support for 5G network. Can we add it as a place holder? Regards, Vimal From: onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org> [mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org] On Behalf Of Alla Goldner Sent: Friday, July 07, 2017 12:37 PM To: onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-usecase...@lists.onap.org> Cc: onap-disc...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-disc...@lists.onap.org>; onap-tsc <onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>> Subject: [onap-tsc] Use case subcommittee - agenda for the upcoming meeting this Monday Hi all, Here is agenda for the upcoming meeting. In case of any additional topics, or concrete use cases proposals for discussion, I kindly ask to let me know in advance, so meeting’s time can be managed accordingly. 1. Review of suggested Use case subcommittee flow of operation as documented here https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Usecase+subcommittee<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_display_DW_Usecase-2Bsubcommittee&d=DwMFAw&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=YQZaNPLN15xk3BWcVl7k8w&m=fJeFF2gsoUxIvMSd7LwlFJm195aQf6PCsGoLcOOJcVs&s=_gs9OYnZ5I93MA1QgqXnFJ9luEVCYalLple1Iynub1w&e=> , “Use case subcommittee flow” 2. R1 use cases (vCPE and vVoLTE): Status, Open issues, required actions 3. R2 use cases: the initial proposals * Network Function Change Management? * Enterprise vCPE? * More? 4. AOB Note: The previous meeting minutes can be found under https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/Usecase+Subcommittee+Meeting+Minutes<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_display_DW_Usecase-2BSubcommittee-2BMeeting-2BMinutes&d=DwMFAw&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=YQZaNPLN15xk3BWcVl7k8w&m=fJeFF2gsoUxIvMSd7LwlFJm195aQf6PCsGoLcOOJcVs&s=Ge_R73iwTJpZgq5qdnsov29qxNgMl0rG5yOlYTp1bVk&e=> Best regards, Alla Goldner Open Network Division Amdocs Technology <image001.png> This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement, you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.amdocs.com_about_email-2Ddisclaimer&d=DwMFAw&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=YQZaNPLN15xk3BWcVl7k8w&m=fJeFF2gsoUxIvMSd7LwlFJm195aQf6PCsGoLcOOJcVs&s=OXNNDyrj75gn-js0w0ShMMbQLpdKTcZMb2D7w9X1i5E&e=> This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement, you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.amdocs.com_about_email-2Ddisclaimer&d=DwMFbw&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=IKSC5mg8GeOiSar1dax3GQ&m=lVCxGDhxrD2zCxLVtJ0ZMCaLQH3kAumZVZH1vDLP1hY&s=YDAd-BS1BNb60Pc9q83gkzM5Ehco31XKaoEYEEF2wfM&e=> This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement, you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.amdocs.com_about_email-2Ddisclaimer&d=DwMFbw&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=IKSC5mg8GeOiSar1dax3GQ&m=lVCxGDhxrD2zCxLVtJ0ZMCaLQH3kAumZVZH1vDLP1hY&s=YDAd-BS1BNb60Pc9q83gkzM5Ehco31XKaoEYEEF2wfM&e=> _______________________________________________ onap-discuss mailing list onap-disc...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-disc...@lists.onap.org> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__lists.onap.org_mailman_listinfo_onap-2Ddiscuss&d=DwICAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=IKSC5mg8GeOiSar1dax3GQ&m=lVCxGDhxrD2zCxLVtJ0ZMCaLQH3kAumZVZH1vDLP1hY&s=ypIItYkZsZWXNmcDlcOLiD407wmhgeW_H8-c7uL51ok&e=
_______________________________________________ ONAP-TSC mailing list ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc
