Hi, Nati, I agree with that general rules. Here’re two clarification: 1. At runtime, ONAP doesn’t need any commercial license.
2. Secondly, for normal user, like the broader community, the logs we print out is good enough for high level debugging. However, for advanced users, like we need to looking into java code itself to figure out those complex issues, the commercial tools could make those users more productive. We are open to alternative, any suggestion on better debug Camunda than Camunda cockpit is highly appreciated. Regards, Helen Chen From: Nati Shalom <na...@cloudify.co> Date: Wednesday, October 25, 2017 at 11:49 AM To: Helen Chen 00725961 <helen.c...@huawei.com> Cc: Seshu m <seshu.kuma...@huawei.com>, onap-tsc <onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>, "rd4...@att.com" <rd4...@att.com> Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] Issue with Camunda cockpit license Seshu I think that this is the wrong direction to go. In general we need to make sure that ONAP is not dependent on such third party tools that are blocking developers features and debugging tools which really make the tools useless in the broader community context. Instead of buying license we should simply demand that those features will be available to to the community or start looking for alternatives. OpenSource that are monetizing in those area's are not really open IMO. Nati S. On Tue, Oct 24, 2017 at 6:56 PM Yunxia Chen <helen.c...@huawei.com<mailto:helen.c...@huawei.com>> wrote: I am second on this one. While we are doing integration testing, Rob from AT&T has to export those data, and come back to AT&T to check for it. The Enterprise edition license could definitely help speed up the process. Regards, Helen Chen From: <onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc-boun...@lists.onap.org>> on behalf of Seshu m <seshu.kuma...@huawei.com<mailto:seshu.kuma...@huawei.com>> Date: Tuesday, October 24, 2017 at 7:28 AM To: onap-tsc <onap-tsc@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-tsc@lists.onap.org>> Cc: "rd4...@att.com<mailto:rd4...@att.com>" <rd4...@att.com<mailto:rd4...@att.com>> Subject: [onap-tsc] Issue with Camunda cockpit license Dear TSC, Currently SO team is fore-seeing risks on identification and debugging the critical issues reported and like to seek help from TSC. The workflow in the SO uses BPMN and groovy scripts and Camunda cockpit tool used for purpose of debugging the state of the BPMN flows. The issue we have right now is Camunda Cockpit features we are looking for are only available with the Enterprise edition license (and this is currently available with the ATT). And it would be great if we could leverage similar license for SO community , while I reached out to Camunda.org to get the quote on this and waiting for their response. Please let me know your inputs and I like to discuss this more on up-coming TSC meeting. ________________________________ Best regards Seshu Kumar M Huawei Technologies India Pvt, Ltd. ________________________________ 本邮件及其附件含有华为公司的保密信息，仅限于发送给上面地址中列出的个人或群组。禁 止任何其他人以任何形式使用（包括但不限于全部或部分地泄露、复制、或散发）本邮件中 的信息。如果您错收了本邮件，请您立即电话或邮件通知发件人并删除本邮件！ This e-mail and its attachments contain confidential information from HUAWEI, which is intended only for the person or entity whose address is listed above. Any use of the information contained herein in any way (including, but not limited to, total or partial disclosure, reproduction, or dissemination) by persons other than the intended recipient(s) is prohibited. If you receive this e-mail in error, please notify the sender by phone or email immediately and delete it! _______________________________________________ ONAP-TSC mailing list ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org<mailto:ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org> https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc
_______________________________________________ ONAP-TSC mailing list ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org https://lists.onap.org/mailman/listinfo/onap-tsc
