+1

thanks & regards,
Dhananjay Pavgi
+91 98220 22264

From: ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org <ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org> On Behalf Of Alex Vul
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2018 6:11 PM
To: Andrei Kojukhov <andrei.kojuk...@amdocs.com>; Andy Mayer <am8...@att.com>; 
onap-disc...@lists.onap.org; denghu...@huawei.com; ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org
Cc: Lingli Deng <denglin...@chinamobile.com>; Mark Gibson <mar...@amdocs.com>; 
'eric.deb...@orange.com' <eric.deb...@orange.com>; WECHSLER, CHESLA C 
<cw1...@att.com>; 'Mehmet Toy' <mehmet....@verizon.com>; 'Davis, Nigel' 
<nda...@ciena.com>; 'Ranganathan, Raghu' <rra...@ciena.com>; 'Priya TG' 
<priy...@netcracker.com>; KATZMAN, ANATOLY <ak4...@intl.att.com>; LANDO, 
MICHAEL <ml6...@intl.att.com>; HALLAHAN, RYAN <rh1...@att.com>
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] [modeling] new proposal to change TSC 
report consensus slide wording

+1

From: Andrei Kojukhov [mailto:andrei.kojuk...@amdocs.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2018 05:06
To: Andy Mayer <am8...@att.com<mailto:am8...@att.com>>; 
onap-disc...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-disc...@lists.onap.org>; 
denghu...@huawei.com<mailto:denghu...@huawei.com>; 
ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org<mailto:ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org>
Cc: Lingli Deng 
<denglin...@chinamobile.com<mailto:denglin...@chinamobile.com>>; Mark Gibson 
<mar...@amdocs.com<mailto:mar...@amdocs.com>>; 'eric.deb...@orange.com' 
<eric.deb...@orange.com<mailto:eric.deb...@orange.com>>; WECHSLER, CHESLA C 
<cw1...@att.com<mailto:cw1...@att.com>>; 'Mehmet Toy' 
<mehmet....@verizon.com<mailto:mehmet....@verizon.com>>; Vul, Alex 
<alex....@intel.com<mailto:alex....@intel.com>>; 'Davis, Nigel' 
<nda...@ciena.com<mailto:nda...@ciena.com>>; 'Ranganathan, Raghu' 
<rra...@ciena.com<mailto:rra...@ciena.com>>; 'Priya TG' 
<priy...@netcracker.com<mailto:priy...@netcracker.com>>; KATZMAN, ANATOLY 
<ak4...@intl.att.com<mailto:ak4...@intl.att.com>>; LANDO, MICHAEL 
<ml6...@intl.att.com<mailto:ml6...@intl.att.com>>; HALLAHAN, RYAN 
<rh1...@att.com<mailto:rh1...@att.com>>
Subject: RE: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] [modeling] new proposal to change TSC 
report consensus slide wording

+1

From: ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org<mailto:ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org> 
<ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org<mailto:ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org>> On Behalf Of Andy 
Mayer
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2018 2:49 PM
To: onap-disc...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-disc...@lists.onap.org>; 
denghu...@huawei.com<mailto:denghu...@huawei.com>; 
ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org<mailto:ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org>
Cc: Andrei Kojukhov 
<andrei.kojuk...@amdocs.com<mailto:andrei.kojuk...@amdocs.com>>; Lingli Deng 
<denglin...@chinamobile.com<mailto:denglin...@chinamobile.com>>; Mark Gibson 
<mar...@amdocs.com<mailto:mar...@amdocs.com>>; 'eric.deb...@orange.com' 
<eric.deb...@orange.com<mailto:eric.deb...@orange.com>>; WECHSLER, CHESLA C 
<cw1...@att.com<mailto:cw1...@att.com>>; 'Mehmet Toy' 
<mehmet....@verizon.com<mailto:mehmet....@verizon.com>>; 'Alex Vul' 
<alex....@intel.com<mailto:alex....@intel.com>>; 'Davis, Nigel' 
<nda...@ciena.com<mailto:nda...@ciena.com>>; 'Ranganathan, Raghu' 
<rra...@ciena.com<mailto:rra...@ciena.com>>; 'Priya TG' 
<priy...@netcracker.com<mailto:priy...@netcracker.com>>; KATZMAN, ANATOLY 
<ak4...@intl.att.com<mailto:ak4...@intl.att.com>>; LANDO, MICHAEL 
<ml6...@intl.att.com<mailto:ml6...@intl.att.com>>; HALLAHAN, RYAN 
<rh1...@att.com<mailto:rh1...@att.com>>
Subject: Re: [onap-tsc] [onap-discuss] [modeling] new proposal to change TSC 
report consensus slide wording

Modeling Team,

I am concerned that the current wording of the Modeling Sub-committee meeting 
report is not extremely clear and may be confusing.
Please +1 on this [Modeling] email thread if you support the more detailed 
description of the agreement.  It would be good to have a clear statement to 
present to the TSC.

If you would, please consider updating the wording to be more clear:

•               Agreement that the VNF Descriptor model for On-Boarding and the 
Internal ONAP models are distinct.

•               Acknowledgement that there are two Internal ONAP VNF Descriptor 
Data Models that will evolve where possible in a coordinated way in support of 
the Casablanca Use Cases

§  ONAP R2+ Design-Time Resource DM clean version enhancement for VoLTE, CCVPN, 
vCPEstretch goal

§  ONAP SDC TOSCA AID enhancement for vCPE

•               During the Casablanca cycle, begin a collaborative effort for 
creating a combined ONAP Internal VNF Descriptor Data Model representation for 
R4 and beyond (including continued alignment with the VNF Descriptor 
Information Model)

•               Engage impacted components for understanding data model 
impacts, and what is possible in Dublin and beyond (SDC, SO, VFC, A&AI, OOF, 
CLAMP)

•               The decision to support a transition to SOL001 as an ONAP 
on-boarding option is being deferred.


Best Regards,
Andy

Andy Mayer, Ph.D. | PMTS, D2.0 Integration | AT&T Labs | Phone: +1 (732) 
420-9945 | am8...@att.com<mailto:am8...@att.com>

From: Lingli Deng [mailto:denglin...@chinamobile.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2018 5:39 AM
To: onap-disc...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-disc...@lists.onap.org>; 
denghu...@huawei.com<mailto:denghu...@huawei.com>; 
ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org<mailto:ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org>
Cc: MAYER, ANDREW J <am8...@att.com<mailto:am8...@att.com>>; 'Andrei Kojukhov' 
<andrei.kojuk...@amdocs.com<mailto:andrei.kojuk...@amdocs.com>>
Subject: RE: [onap-discuss] [modeling] new proposal to change TSC report 
consensus slide wording

Hi Hui and all,

Please see my comment inline blow highlighted in yellow.

Lingli

From: onap-disc...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-disc...@lists.onap.org> 
<onap-disc...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-disc...@lists.onap.org>> On Behalf Of 
denghui (L)
Sent: 2018年7月19日 11:15
To: onap-disc...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-disc...@lists.onap.org>; 
ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org<mailto:ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org>
Cc: MAYER, ANDREW J <am8...@att.com<mailto:am8...@att.com>>; Andrei Kojukhov 
<andrei.kojuk...@amdocs.com<mailto:andrei.kojuk...@amdocs.com>>
Subject: [onap-discuss] [modeling] new proposal to change TSC report consensus 
slide wording

Hello Modelers,

I have received comments from Andy and Andrei after the meeting about our 
consensuses slide, as below, according to their proposal, 3 changes are listed 
below:
1) Clarify On-Boarding and the Internal ONAP models are distinct
[dll] I do not think we have consensus on this. We could even save the 
translator in SDC if internal model and onboarding model is the same. We don’t 
have to decide now that these two are distinct.
2) remove “align with R3 IM”
[dll] DM align with IM is a basic principle for ONAP modeling practice. And IM 
has a profound impact to implementation. So I would prefer we keep the 
statement.
3) removing the statement “(backward compatible with onboarding model)

According to our recorded session
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/2018+2H+Modeling+sub-committee+meeting+agenda+and+minutes<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_display_DW_2018-2B2H-2BModeling-2Bsub-2Dcommittee-2Bmeeting-2Bagenda-2Band-2Bminutes&d=DwMFbw&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=3UIWLh7P2rAFm1qdZ7jMYQ&m=bB8UhEIC_nzKTMeIrL3UU3vQTY_1gzZKH6pnlCIY7Xk&s=1GLn3jlctxC3DHjMB5cpoiNSdDGLHO7At0lh4wpb90w&e=>

I re-listen to the recorded session 20180717, I did ask any objection to the 
final consensus in the end.
only Michela raised the  comments to remove 3rd bullet.  I did explain the 
reason, and didn’t hear any objection from Michela any more.

In this case, my judge would be from our session
3) is not yet a 100% consensuses assuming Michela not reponse in time,  but 1) 
and 2) are 2 new proposals to change the existing consensus

So I am asking the modeling subcommittee here whether you agree to add 1) and 
remove 2)
If there is no any objection before TSC call, I will revise them as this 
proposal.

Thanks a lot

DENG Hui




From: Andrei Kojukhov [mailto:andrei.kojuk...@amdocs.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 19, 2018 4:10 AM
To: MAYER, ANDREW J <am8...@att.com<mailto:am8...@att.com>>; denghui (L) 
<denghu...@huawei.com<mailto:denghu...@huawei.com>>; Lingli Deng 
<denglin...@chinamobile.com<mailto:denglin...@chinamobile.com>>
Cc: 'eric.deb...@orange.com' 
<eric.deb...@orange.com<mailto:eric.deb...@orange.com>>; Mark Gibson 
<mar...@amdocs.com<mailto:mar...@amdocs.com>>; 'Mehmet Toy' 
<mehmet....@verizon.com<mailto:mehmet....@verizon.com>>; 'Alex Vul' 
<alex....@intel.com<mailto:alex....@intel.com>>; 'Davis, Nigel' 
<nda...@ciena.com<mailto:nda...@ciena.com>>; 'Ranganathan, Raghu' 
<rra...@ciena.com<mailto:rra...@ciena.com>>; 'Priya TG' 
<priy...@netcracker.com<mailto:priy...@netcracker.com>>; WECHSLER, CHESLA C 
<cw1...@att.com<mailto:cw1...@att.com>>; KATZMAN, ANATOLY 
<ak4...@intl.att.com<mailto:ak4...@intl.att.com>>; LANDO, MICHAEL 
<ml6...@intl.att.com<mailto:ml6...@intl.att.com>>; HALLAHAN, RYAN 
<rh1...@att.com<mailto:rh1...@att.com>>; Lingli Deng 
<denglin...@chinamobile.com<mailto:denglin...@chinamobile.com>>
Subject: RE: Minutes from Today's Meeting

Andy, Denghui, Lingli

I tend to agree with Andy. What I captured from a meeting screen is quickly 
adding sentences to a reporting slide by a chair because of lack of time.
There is obviously a room for making mistakes and inaccurate wording.

BR

Andrei

From: MAYER, ANDREW J <am8...@att.com<mailto:am8...@att.com>>
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2018 10:30 PM
To: denghui (L) <denghu...@huawei.com<mailto:denghu...@huawei.com>>; Lingli 
Deng <denglin...@chinamobile.com<mailto:denglin...@chinamobile.com>>
Cc: 'eric.deb...@orange.com' 
<eric.deb...@orange.com<mailto:eric.deb...@orange.com>>; Andrei Kojukhov 
<andrei.kojuk...@amdocs.com<mailto:andrei.kojuk...@amdocs.com>>; Mark Gibson 
<mar...@amdocs.com<mailto:mar...@amdocs.com>>; 'Mehmet Toy' 
<mehmet....@verizon.com<mailto:mehmet....@verizon.com>>; 'Alex Vul' 
<alex....@intel.com<mailto:alex....@intel.com>>; 'Davis, Nigel' 
<nda...@ciena.com<mailto:nda...@ciena.com>>; 'Ranganathan, Raghu' 
<rra...@ciena.com<mailto:rra...@ciena.com>>; 'Priya TG' 
<priy...@netcracker.com<mailto:priy...@netcracker.com>>; WECHSLER, CHESLA C 
<cw1...@att.com<mailto:cw1...@att.com>>; KATZMAN, ANATOLY 
<ak4...@intl.att.com<mailto:ak4...@intl.att.com>>; LANDO, MICHAEL 
<ml6...@intl.att.com<mailto:ml6...@intl.att.com>>; HALLAHAN, RYAN 
<rh1...@att.com<mailto:rh1...@att.com>>; Lingli Deng 
<denglin...@chinamobile.com<mailto:denglin...@chinamobile.com>>
Subject: RE: Minutes from Today's Meeting

Denghui,

We appreciate that you captured some of the major points that were agreed to 
during the Modeling Sub-committee call.

We do have a few questions that need clarification on the TSC readout:

  *   How was the agreement captured that the VNF Descriptor model for 
On-Boarding and the Internal ONAP models are distinct? We reached consensus on 
this point multiple times during the Modeling Sub-committee call, but it is not 
listed. Please reflect this important point.
  *   During the call there did not seem to be clear consensus with the 
statement “align with R3 IM”. Based on the recording we all agreed that we need 
keep the Information Modeling and Data Modeling aligned during the 
collaborative work on the internal data model for R4 and beyond. However, since 
it was not a clear agreement, please remove “align with R3 IM”
  *   Please consider removing the statement “(backward compatible with 
onboarding model)”.  Based on the recording, it wasn’t clear during the call 
that we had community consensus on this particular statement.

Best Regards,
Andy

Andy Mayer, Ph.D. | PMTS, D2.0 Integration | AT&T Labs | Phone: +1 (732) 
420-9945 | am8...@att.com<mailto:am8...@att.com>



From: denghui (L)
Sent: Wednesday, July 18, 2018 11:16 AM
To: 'onap-disc...@lists.onap.org' 
<onap-disc...@lists.onap.org<mailto:onap-disc...@lists.onap.org>>; 
'ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org' 
<ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org<mailto:ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org>>
Subject: [modeling] Meeting minutes, slides and video recorded available for 
modeling subcommittee call yesterday

Hello all

Please kindly help to review yesterday meeting minutes, slides, and video 
recorded as below link:
https://wiki.onap.org/display/DW/2018+2H+Modeling+sub-committee+meeting+agenda+and+minutes<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__wiki.onap.org_display_DW_2018-2B2H-2BModeling-2Bsub-2Dcommittee-2Bmeeting-2Bagenda-2Band-2Bminutes&d=DwMFbw&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=3UIWLh7P2rAFm1qdZ7jMYQ&m=bB8UhEIC_nzKTMeIrL3UU3vQTY_1gzZKH6pnlCIY7Xk&s=1GLn3jlctxC3DHjMB5cpoiNSdDGLHO7At0lh4wpb90w&e=>

thanks a lot for your checking
Best regards

DENG Hui
This message and the information contained herein is proprietary and 
confidential and subject to the Amdocs policy statement,
you may review at https://www.amdocs.com/about/email-disclaimer

============================================================================================================================

Disclaimer:  This message and the information contained herein is proprietary 
and confidential and subject to the Tech Mahindra policy statement, you may 
review the policy at http://www.techmahindra.com/Disclaimer.html 
<http://www.techmahindra.com/Disclaimer.html> externally 
http://tim.techmahindra.com/tim/disclaimer.html 
<http://tim.techmahindra.com/tim/disclaimer.html> internally within 
TechMahindra.

============================================================================================================================

-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.

View/Reply Online (#3451): https://lists.onap.org/g/ONAP-TSC/message/3451
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/23743138/21656
Group Owner: onap-tsc+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/ONAP-TSC/unsub  [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-

Reply via email to