Hi John
Very interested in the ETSI SOL related discussion:
Some backgrounds from my experiences in VFC project and SO project:
In ONAP R1&R2, There is SOL005 interface between the SO and VFC, and
SOL003 between the VFC and VNFM(vendor or GVNFM).
In ONAP R2, VFC has started the work to align the latest SOL
interface. please see the JIRA: https://jira.onap.org/browse/VFC-635 and commit
some codes. In ONAP R3, VFC will continue to do the work.
In the VFC there already extists the vendor VNFM driver and do the
implication enhancement.
If interested the ETSI SOL interfaces and avoid creating a new wheels,
suggest working together in the VFC team and collaborating with each other.
Does it make sense? thanks
BR
Maopeng
原始邮件
发件人：JohnQ <john.qui...@ericsson.com>
收件人：ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org
<ONAP-TSC@lists.onap.org>christopher.don...@huawei.com
<christopher.don...@huawei.com>
日 期 ：2018年07月19日 22:02
主 题 ：[onap-tsc] Casablanca Architecture presentation question
Hi Chris
Thanks for pulling this together. Two quick observation/questions
The work on the standards alignment could be clearer on where it is impacting
on Casablanca. On Slide 8 it is easy to miss the targeted SOL003 VNFM plugin
for SO.
I just have a quick question should the slide from 9 onwards reflect the
proposed changes in Casablanca? If so the VNFM plug-in to SO could be better
reflected in 10 and 11. I would suggest reflecting that the VNF LCM interface
that SO consumes is SOL003 on slide 10 and 11.
Regards
John
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
Links: You receive all messages sent to this group.
View/Reply Online (#3475): https://lists.onap.org/g/ONAP-TSC/message/3475
Mute This Topic: https://lists.onap.org/mt/23750390/21656
Group Owner: onap-tsc+ow...@lists.onap.org
Unsubscribe: https://lists.onap.org/g/ONAP-TSC/unsub [arch...@mail-archive.com]
-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-
