> Some projects have jpl.eda directories instead of gov.nasa.jpl. I still need > a special pass to handle them (specifically: 'product', 'profile', 'query', > 'xmlquery') but I have a question: Do we want to maintain the 'eda' legacy -- > i.e.: should we create o/a/eda as well as o/a/oodt, or do you think we should > somehow unify them going forward?
My two cents: "eda" must die. Unify. The only legacy it ever had was our stillborn bid back at JPL in early 2000s to become the lab-wide metadata layer. Changing our name from OODT to EDA (and then to EDM, ugh) wasn't sufficient—but it certainly was stupid. Thanks for all your effort on this tedious but necessary work!
