Space: Apache OpenOffice Community (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS) Page: User Guides Revisted (https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/User+Guides+Revisted) Comment: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/User+Guides+Revisted?focusedCommentId=30151424#comment-30151424
Comment added by Kay Schenk: --------------------------------------------------------------------- Scenario 1: Not really an option but a default. This is what we have now and I have been greatly tempted since the release of 3.4 to link to the draft docs for AOO 3.4 at the ODFAuthors site, but got too busy to bring this up. (Additioanlly, all documentation areas on the web server and wiki need realignment). Scenario 2. (my preferred option) Please elaborate on the "cons" of this option. For example, if work continues with ODFAuthors, where are the docs really hosted? ODFAuthors is already a well-known site for the documents. Can we continue to view this entity as the "official" producer/host of the User Guides and just link/refer people to them? Are we concerned about full control? Why would there be distribution problems. Scenario 3: Nice, but, why start over when a successful process (ODFAuthors) is already in existence. Additionally, the mechanism for development would need to be determined and maintained,etc. Change your notification preferences: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/users/viewnotifications.action
