On 25 Jun 2011, at 12:23, Rob Weir wrote: > 3) Create lists only when there is a sufficient number of project > members on the Apache list asking for new list. > > I think I like approach #3 better. There are downsides to having more > lists than we need. It fragments the discussion. If we have 93 > language projects with each one having dev/marketing/user, etc., > lists, then we have 500 or so mailing lists, most of which see little > or no traffic. Do we really want to recreate that at Apache?
If this approach was taken, what would you propose should happen to the "history" for all the lists that had not been migrated here by the time the Oracle-hosted servers were turned off? S.
