On Jun 26, 2011, at 8:38 AM, Joe Schaefer wrote: > At this point infrastructure would be interested in > seeing the DNS zone file for openoffice.org, so we > can get some idea of how many different services > we're talking about. > > > If someone has that information, please forward it > to me privately. Thanks.
I was interested in the zone file, but couldn't get oracle's dns to send it to me. Why privately? Are you preparing to do the Domain Name registration change followed by a Zone transfer? At which point it is possible to replace services as we wish. There is a mapping being built here: https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/OOo-Sitemap and a little differently here https://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/OOOUSERS/Transition+Planning Regards, Dave > > > > ----- Original Message ---- >> From: Simon Phipps <si...@webmink.com> >> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org >> Sent: Sun, June 26, 2011 11:33:09 AM >> Subject: Preserving Legacy Content (was: Contributors versus Committers >> versus >> PMC members - AND USERS) >> >> >> On 26 Jun 2011, at 12:21, Rob Weir wrote: >> >>> We have three basic options for legacy content: >>> >>> 1) Migrate it to a dynamic equivalent, e.g. form to forum, list to >>> list, wiki to wiki. This might be using the same software or a >>> different one, though obviously migration is more difficult cross >>> apps, especially in the absence of standard formats. >>> >>> 2) Archive the content statically, e..g., wget the entire wiki, forum >>> or list and store the static pages for reference. Ideally, search >>> engines and external links don't notice the change. >>> >>> 3) Ignore the legacy content and let it disappear. >>> >>> I think this is a case-by-case decision that we'll want to make, based >>> at least partially on how how active the existing service is. If it >>> gets no writes, but many reads, then #2 might be appropriate. If it >>> is active with both reads and writes then that would recommend #1. >> >> I think option 2 ought to be our default for the whole project, with all >> links >> always working. From the discussions so far, it seems we are likely to >> establish new venues and modes of interaction that would make option 1 an >> exception, and option 3 is always to be avoided in a community with as long >> as >> legacy as OpenOffice.org >> >> Cheers, >> >> S. >> >>
