Yes, exactly!

Sent from my iPhone

On Jul 12, 2011, at 8:39 AM, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote:

> On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net> wrote:
>> 
>> On Jul 12, 2011, at 8:03 AM, Simon Phipps wrote:
>> 
>>> 
>>> On 12 Jul 2011, at 15:38, Dave Fisher wrote:
>>>> 
>>>> On Jul 12, 2011, at 7:03 AM, Simon Phipps wrote:
>>>> 
>>>>> 
>>>>> On 12 Jul 2011, at 13:32, Kai Ahrens wrote:
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> Of course it makes a difference to ask our users instead of asking some
>>>>>> deeply involved people on this list, having very subjective interests in
>>>>>> one or the other direction.
>>>>>> 
>>>>>> And in the end, the user rules, not any marketing speech.
>>>>> 
>>>>> While that sounds good, I'm not sure it's the Apache way and I'd welcome 
>>>>> a comment from one of the mentors.
>>>>> 
>>>> 
>>>> See Daneese Cooper's emails.
>>> 
>>> Did you have a specific one in mind? Naturally I read everything Danese 
>>> writes, but so far I have not seen her comment on the issue of whether and 
>>> how market research over-rides the interests of Apache members.
>> 
>> Sorry, I am out of pocket and this thread is so long. Basically she is 
>> talking about consulting one of the ASF's attorney's regarding the names and 
>> brand dilution issues from a legal standpoint.
> 
> You are likely referring to this post then:
> 
> http://s.apache.org/UxA
> 
>> I hadn't gotten to market research. I'm focused on migration and the 
>> websites - all names are possible right now and in the future. I don't want 
>> to tie the branding too tightly in the web design. The Apache CMS will allow 
>> us to isolate these elements.
>> 
>> Regards,
>> Dave
> 
> - Sam Ruby

Reply via email to