Yes, exactly! Sent from my iPhone
On Jul 12, 2011, at 8:39 AM, Sam Ruby <ru...@intertwingly.net> wrote: > On Tue, Jul 12, 2011 at 11:25 AM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net> wrote: >> >> On Jul 12, 2011, at 8:03 AM, Simon Phipps wrote: >> >>> >>> On 12 Jul 2011, at 15:38, Dave Fisher wrote: >>>> >>>> On Jul 12, 2011, at 7:03 AM, Simon Phipps wrote: >>>> >>>>> >>>>> On 12 Jul 2011, at 13:32, Kai Ahrens wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> Of course it makes a difference to ask our users instead of asking some >>>>>> deeply involved people on this list, having very subjective interests in >>>>>> one or the other direction. >>>>>> >>>>>> And in the end, the user rules, not any marketing speech. >>>>> >>>>> While that sounds good, I'm not sure it's the Apache way and I'd welcome >>>>> a comment from one of the mentors. >>>>> >>>> >>>> See Daneese Cooper's emails. >>> >>> Did you have a specific one in mind? Naturally I read everything Danese >>> writes, but so far I have not seen her comment on the issue of whether and >>> how market research over-rides the interests of Apache members. >> >> Sorry, I am out of pocket and this thread is so long. Basically she is >> talking about consulting one of the ASF's attorney's regarding the names and >> brand dilution issues from a legal standpoint. > > You are likely referring to this post then: > > http://s.apache.org/UxA > >> I hadn't gotten to market research. I'm focused on migration and the >> websites - all names are possible right now and in the future. I don't want >> to tie the branding too tightly in the web design. The Apache CMS will allow >> us to isolate these elements. >> >> Regards, >> Dave > > - Sam Ruby