----- Original Message ---- > From: Marcus (OOo) <marcus.m...@wtnet.de> > To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org > Sent: Mon, July 18, 2011 12:59:07 PM > Subject: Re: Apache CMS Workflow and a Key Question > > Am 07/18/2011 06:31 PM, schrieb Pedro F. Giffuni: > > > > > > --- On Mon, 7/18/11, Marcus (OOo)<marcus.m...@wtnet.de> wrote: > > > > ... > >>> > >>> So, all is not necessarily lost - but it does depend > >>> on whether you want to reload the SVN repo. > >> > >> I don't know how you thought about CVS but the respective > >> repo is already on SVN. > >> > > > > I am confused. Apparently (I am a newcomer) OOo has moved > > from several VCSs: > > CVS --> SVN --> Hg --> SVN (Apache) > > > > In each conversion one necessarily looses some information. > > Have we lost significant history during any of those conversions? > > > > Perhaps we can take a previous SVN (assumming it exists) and > > do the conversion progressively from there? > > > > Just wondering though.. I am sure the people doing this are > > taking their time for a reason ;). > > Please don't mix things up. I'm talking about the SVN repo that has the > website stuff and not the core source code of OOo. > > Of course we want to keep the repo history of the OOo source code. But > IMHO it's not necessary to keep itfor the website. Of course we can do > this, too, if someone means it's important. But it would be the stuff > from February, 23rd until today. The older stuff is already lost. >
Okay. Understood. I think we got some confusion into this thread. Ben
