On Mon, Jul 18, 2011 at 7:29 PM, Donald Harbison <dpharbi...@gmail.com> wrote: > Yes, that is the right sequence. Our project is Apache OpenOffice, no > question there. The intent behind the future code contribution of Symphony > is to make it possible to harvest some of the value from it, and to merge > that value into Apache OpenOffice. PPMC members affiliated with IBM, will be > volunteering to do this effort in collaboration with others in the project, > in the Apache Way. > > Building Apache OpenOffice from Oracle's Software Grant to Apache is the > priority. If there's another view on this, let's here it.
Symphony replaced most of OO.o's GPL/LGPL dependencies with more liberally licensed code. Shouldn't we use those bits now, to get to Apache OO.o quickly? Damjan
