On Jul 28, 2011 12:44 PM, "Rob Weir" <apa...@robweir.com> wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 28, 2011 at 3:18 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton > <dennis.hamil...@acm.org> wrote: > > Greg, > > > > Simple version of the question: Is your putting notices on everything your personal practice or is it a requirement that this be done with all textual artifacts where notices are possible? > > > > - Dennis > > > > LONGER VERSION > > > > I looked over the ooo/trunk/tools/dev/ repository and noticed that you put Apache notices on all of your files, including .txt and .sh. > > > > I have been setting up forensic tools on a different repository that I happen to be the sole committer for, and I wanted to stage things so that they could be cleanly transferred/granted to Apache if that became desirable at some point. I am being careful with category A third-party code, not using any other kind, and putting everything else and the combined works under an Apache license. > > > > Is it a rigorous requirement to put Apache notices on all textual files that I am placing under the Apache license? (I have test data that, by its nature, I can't do that with, but I can do so on the containers and descriptive texts about that data.) > > > > Does this page answer your question? > > http://www.apache.org/legal/src-headers.html
Right. Whenever possible. We have a tool called RAT (no link handy right now) that will help identify files missing a header. We can start running that later, after we get things building. Cheers, -g
