On Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Dave Fisher <dave2w...@comcast.net> wrote: > I just sent in a test email from my work email. Please do not divulge my > employer. (Ah these corporate rules ;-) >
Message arrived, no moderation note. > Regards, > Dave > > On Jul 29, 2011, at 2:54 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > >> You're probably right. It is up to the list subscribers to know what to >> ignore then. >> >> We haven't had anything from an unknown sender yet, so we can know for sure. >> >> - Dennis >> >> -----Original Message----- >> From: Daniel Shahaf [mailto:d...@daniel.shahaf.name] >> Sent: Friday, July 29, 2011 13:42 >> To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org >> Subject: Re: Operating ooo-security (was RE: Population of ooo-security) >> >> Dennis E. Hamilton wrote on Fri, Jul 29, 2011 at 13:28:01 -0700: >>> We are in a very fledgling situation here. Let's see if we can clear up a >>> few things. >>> >>> Here is my understanding of the situation as it exists at the moment. >>> >>> - Dennis >>> >>> 1. The ooo-security@i.a.o list is private and moderated. Anyone can >>> send a message to the list. The three current moderators of the list >>> share responsibility for allowing a post onto the list or not. >>> Anyone can also attempt to subscribe to the list. Once the requester >>> completes the e-mail verification ceremony, the request is submitted >>> for approval by the moderators. In this case, the way the moderators >>> decline is by doing nothing. >> >> I thought that security@ lists were moderated for subscription but not >> for posting. >> > >
