Simon stuck this in the next gen support technology thread, but I think this deserves its own top level thread. He declined to move it into its own thread, but I will.
If I understand Simon's recurring proposal correctly, he would like us to: 1) Not produce any AOOo binaries for end user use, especially not for Linux. 2) Not support end-users 3) Transfer the OpenOffice.org trademark and logo to The Document Foundation/LibreOffice, if not permanently, then at least for a long-term loan 4) Concentrate on producing source code components that can be used by LibreOffice So in general, he would like us to not do anything that could be seen as a legitimate continuation of the OOo project or as an alternative to LibreOffice, the fork he helped created and continues to advise. He suggests that we have not given this proposal serious consideration, and now that the source code is almost checked in, we should do so. So what do you think? -Rob
