On Aug 28, 2011, at 1:31 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > Dave, > > I'm not sure what you are referring to. You added a number of locations > where?
In places like http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/support http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/projects http://incubator.apache.org/openofficeorg/contributing are versions of http://support.openoffice.org http://projects.openoffice.org http://contributing.openoffice.org These have Oracle OOo policies and licenses along with www.openoffice.org. I've noticed that some of the html is carrying PDL copyright statements. There will need to be attention to this by the PPMC no hurry, but it is related to the question of prior releases and what gets moved to apache-extras. The types of issues you are raising. When we move development.openoffice.org the issue of old releases and url rewrites is more important. I wish I had a little more time to explain today, but other things have my attention today. Regards, Dave > > -----Original Message----- > From: Dave Fisher [mailto:dave2w...@comcast.net] > Sent: Sunday, August 28, 2011 12:02 > To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org > Cc: 'Peter Junge'; tradema...@apache.org > Subject: Re: [Proposal] Give the BHV publishing house in Kaarst/Germany the > permission to use the OpenOffice.org trademark and logo > > > On Aug 28, 2011, at 11:40 AM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote: > [ ... ] >> HMMM... >> >> Also, and this is probably not the right time for this (especially for >> OpenOffice.org 3.3), we might want to come up with a request (or >> requirement?) that publishers include a link to locations under our support >> where current information, updates, and support about OpenOffice.org can be >> found. (That would be separate from links the publisher might provide for >> updates on their book and on the 10,000+ templates that are provided on the >> DVD.) >> >> We also, now that I think about it, need to provide information in our >> distros and maybe for use in print, about the availability of source code >> for a specific release and for information on source code for other >> releases, including the latest. >> >> [I think I will flag these two as notes-to-self for something we need to pay >> attention to. The specific source-code-availability requirement may not be >> so strict under ALv2 and Apache practice, in contrast with the LGPL >> requirement. It seems like a great thing to perpetuate, regardless. It is >> another reason to keep the openoffice.org domain name operating because of >> linking from material in print as well as on-line.] > > I have added a number of the locations that show the Oracle OOo versions of > these policies in our podling's port of the OOo website. Anyone should feel > free to start adapting these properly. I don't have time to get deeply > engrossed in these details. > > Regards, > Dave > > [ ... ] >
