On 5 Sep 2011, at 19:57, Reizinger Zoltán wrote: <snip> >> >>>> 8) Any project committer, on request, will be made a forum admin or >>>> moderator. >>> +1 >>> But needs to work as a moderator and admin on forum, if they require such >>> role. >> While that's certainly desirable, if PMC members need this kind of access to >> provide oversight, then they need to be able to get access regardless. This >> seems less likely to be required if there's separate archival as suggested >> below. >> >>>> This is how it works with every other project resource -- >>>> mailing lists, source code, website, etc. Committers have rights to >>>> pretty much everything on the project. We trust our committers. We >>>> don't segregate the project into exclusive zones of ownership. >>> -1 >>> It is a misunderstanding of closed forums. >> Perhaps you could elaborate on this? > The "exclusive zone of ownership" is too ambiguous to me in this case, may > be my English is not good enough to understand it. > The closed forums (not seen by ordinary users) used for discussing all forums > common things about of management, updates etc., other for storing spam posts > for limited time, but if committer has admin/moderator access could see the > content.
I wouldn't want to speak for Rob, but my interpretation is that you aren't far apart. Sounds like he wouldn't want the private forums to become a competitor to the pmc-private list, and from your explanation, it sounds like it wouldn't. David
