On Wed, Oct 12, 2011 at 11:47 AM, Pedro Giffuni <p...@apache.org> wrote: > Hi; > > --- On Wed, 10/12/11, Armin Le Grand <armin.le.gr...@me.com> wrote: > >> Hi Pedro, >> >> On 12.10.2011 03:43, Pedro Giffuni wrote: >> > Hi; >> > >> > I committed it as revision 1182166, and noted it in >> > the bug report, but I admit the patch was too big to do >> > a review on it. >> >> Thanks for comitting. I think - as i wrote - for someone >> knowing the core it would have been possible to read the >> diffs. This is not too big from my POV, I have bigger >> changes in the pipeline. >> > > Oh yes, it was not that big, but it touched a lot of files > which made it difficult to get the context. In any case > big patches are sometimes necessary and I was confident > this wouldn't go bad: it was my way of saying "this guy > should be a committer so he can fix the stuff he breaks" > :), >
+1 > Another thing is that we should be focusing on removing > copyleft components and perhaps some cleanups before > doing enhancements. I specifically want to avoid the > situation in LO where the code and the configuration > options keep growing and growing without control to > the point where patches occasionally make gcc run > out of memory. > > I am very likely to commit stuff in these lines if I > get good patches: > > - Removal of libegg. > - Use of OpenSSL instead of nss for AES encryption. > - replacement of glibc (already discussed in the list) > - Updates to the scanner (sane and twain) headers. > - Updating ICC. > - Bring back Xalan. > - Replace Rhino with V8 ! > > And the list will probably grow as ideas keep coming in ;-) > > Pedro. >
