Simon, My unsolicited advice:
There are several topics in the single announcement from ASF. My recommendation is to read the paragraph that mentions TDF as independent of the other material. From here, it looked like an olive branch. It's unfortunate that it looks like a barbed spear to some at the other end. - Dennis -----Original Message----- From: Simon Phipps [mailto:si...@webmink.com] Sent: Friday, October 14, 2011 09:58 To: Jim Jagielski Cc: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org; pr...@apache.org Publicity Subject: Re: Foundation blog posting on Apache OOo On Oct 14, 2011 6:22 PM, "Jim Jagielski" <j...@jagunet.com> wrote: > > If LibreOffice, as an entity, or people "behind" or "involved" > with LO are guilty of the above, then of course the PR applies > to them. If innocent, then of course it does not. I'm not sure that response is going to create much goodwill if I relay it. I read the release as being a response to the publicity created by Team OpenOffice, but since they are not mentioned in it and LibreOffice is (in words spookily reminiscent of Oracle wishing TDF every success for the future a year ago), people are reading it as aimed at them. So to be clear, is the intent here to address Team OpenOffice? S.
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
