On 10/17/2011 10:50 AM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 9:45 AM, Shane Curcuru<[email protected]> wrote:
On 10/17/2011 10:32 AM, Alexandro Colorado wrote:
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 9:25 AM, Shane Curcuru<[email protected]>
wrote:
On 10/14/2011 7:56 PM, Dennis E. Hamilton wrote:
I've been pondering what it takes to choreograph migration of the live
OpenOffice.org properties into Apache custodianship.
...snip...
Great starts all.
Where is the noodling and proposed list of what domains we want to keep
(i.e. host as *.oo.o to keep links, or host at ooo.a.o/* because it's
project oriented information) and what ones we're not going to keep?
I would preffer an *.oo.o is easier to manage and recognized, create
shorter
URLs and also reinforce branding.
I would prefer an ooo.a.o, since that reinforces the Apache branding. Note
that the primary homepage for the project - at least in terms of anyone
interested in participating in the project (i.e. any potential contributors)
- will be the ooo.a.o page.
Sorry I got distracted by the question mark and thought you were asking for
feedback.
No, my fault - I'm talking too much! We are all looking for feedback on
what content the PPMC proposes to host where (once migration is complete
/ in progress). I'm just trying to point out that there are a some
restrictions on which content should be hosted at oo.o versus ooo.a.o.
But the PPMC needs to come up with the plan(s) by discussing it here.
- Shane, off to a meeting and putting the email client down for a bit!
