done
neddam...@comcast.net wrote on Fri, Nov 18, 2011 at 12:21:01 +0000: > I have tried 3 times to get my email removed by sending a message to the > autodelete mailbox. Please rmove mine also. neddam...@comcast.net. > > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "Emanuel Winocur" <2alw...@cox.net> > To: ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org > Sent: Monday, November 7, 2011 1:02:13 PM > Subject: EXPUNGE MY EMAIL ADDRESS > > Dear Friends, I am overwhelmed with the quantity of emails send to me by > many members. I not longer can deal with this!~! PLEASE DELETE ME FROM THE > LIST OF TECHNICAL INFORMATION'S. > Emanuel M. Winocur > 2alw...@cox.net > ----- Original Message ----- > From: "André Schnabel" <andre.schna...@gmx.net> > To: <ooo-dev@incubator.apache.org> > Sent: Monday, November 07, 2011 9:53 AM > Subject: Re: Hunspell dictionaries are not just words lists (+ other > matters) > > > > Hi Rob, > > > > Am 07.11.2011 16:51, schrieb Rob Weir: > >> On Mon, Nov 7, 2011 at 9:58 AM, Andre Schnabel<andre.schna...@gmx.net> > >> wrote: > >> > >> The jurisdiction of the creator only matters in the case of local > >> infringement or in the context of international treaties. And I don't > >> believe any treaties have recognized sui generis IP rights for > >> collections of facts, i.e., databases. It has been discussed but > >> there is no agreement. See the WIPO statement on this: > >> > >> http://www.wipo.int/copyright/en/activities/databases.html > > > > This is not a statement on IP rights for databases - it is a statement on > > IP rights for > > *Non-Original Databases* . > > > > We obviously disagree on this part of the text: > > " The originality requirement that a database must constitute an > > intellectual creation > > by reason of the selection or arrangement of its contents in order to > > enjoy copyright > > protection means that some databases are not protected ..." > > > > So obviously some databases actually are protected. Of course - if you > > think, that a > > dictionary is just a mere collection of words you would obviously come to > > the > > conclusion that this is no intellectual creation. > > > > btw ... if IBM does have dictionaries available, why don't you just > > publish those, if > > there is no copyright protection in place? Doing so would end this > > discussion very > > quickly andwould be a great contribution to the project. > > > > regards, > > > > André >
